Back

Efficacy of a patient isolation hood in reducing exposure to airborne infectious virus in a simulated healthcare setting

Lee, L. Y. Y.; Landry, S. A.; Jamriska, M.; Subedi, D.; Joosten, S. A.; Barr, J. J.; Brown, R.; Kevin, K.; Schofield, R.; Monty, J.; Subbarao, K.; McGain, F.

2022-07-29 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.07.24.22277784 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHealthcare workers treating patients with SARS-CoV-2 are at risk of infection from patient-emitted virus-laden aerosols. We quantified the reduction of airborne infectious virus in a simulated hospital room when a ventilated patient isolation (McMonty) hood was in use. MethodsWe nebulised 109 plaque forming units (PFU) of bacteriophage PhiX174 virus into a 35.1m3 room with a hood active or inactive. The airborne concentration of infectious virus was measured by BioSpot-VIVAS and settle plates using plaque assay quantification on the bacterial host Escherichia coli C. The particle number concentration (PNC) was monitored continuously using an optical particle sizer. ResultsMedian airborne viral concentration in the room reached 1.41 x 105 PFU.m-3 with the hood inactive. Using the active hood as source containment reduced infectious virus concentration by 374-fold in air samples. This was associated with a 109-fold reduction in total airborne particle number escape rate. The deposition of infectious virus on the surface of settle plates was reduced by 87-fold. ConclusionsThe isolation hood significantly reduced airborne infectious virus exposure in a simulated hospital room. Our findings support the use of the hood to limit exposure of healthcare workers to airborne virus in clinical environments. Lay summaryCOVID-19 patients exhale aerosol particles which can potentially carry infectious viruses into the hospital environment, putting healthcare workers at risk of infection. This risk can be reduced by proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to protect workers from virus exposure. More effective strategies, however, aim to provide source control, reducing the amount of virus-contaminated air that is exhaled into the hospital room. The McMonty isolation hood has been developed to trap and decontaminate the air around an infected patient. We tested the efficacy of the hood using a live virus model to mimic a COVID-19 patient in a hospital room. Using the McMonty hood reduced the amount of exhaled air particles in the room by over 109-times. In our tests, people working in the room were exposed to 374-times less infectious virus in the air, and room surfaces were 87-times less contaminated. Our study supports using devices like the McMonty hood in combination with PPE to keep healthcare workers safe from virus exposure at work.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
4
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
7
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
9
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
20
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
22
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%