Efficacy of a patient isolation hood in reducing exposure to airborne infectious virus in a simulated healthcare setting
Lee, L. Y. Y.; Landry, S. A.; Jamriska, M.; Subedi, D.; Joosten, S. A.; Barr, J. J.; Brown, R.; Kevin, K.; Schofield, R.; Monty, J.; Subbarao, K.; McGain, F.
Show abstract
BackgroundHealthcare workers treating patients with SARS-CoV-2 are at risk of infection from patient-emitted virus-laden aerosols. We quantified the reduction of airborne infectious virus in a simulated hospital room when a ventilated patient isolation (McMonty) hood was in use. MethodsWe nebulised 109 plaque forming units (PFU) of bacteriophage PhiX174 virus into a 35.1m3 room with a hood active or inactive. The airborne concentration of infectious virus was measured by BioSpot-VIVAS and settle plates using plaque assay quantification on the bacterial host Escherichia coli C. The particle number concentration (PNC) was monitored continuously using an optical particle sizer. ResultsMedian airborne viral concentration in the room reached 1.41 x 105 PFU.m-3 with the hood inactive. Using the active hood as source containment reduced infectious virus concentration by 374-fold in air samples. This was associated with a 109-fold reduction in total airborne particle number escape rate. The deposition of infectious virus on the surface of settle plates was reduced by 87-fold. ConclusionsThe isolation hood significantly reduced airborne infectious virus exposure in a simulated hospital room. Our findings support the use of the hood to limit exposure of healthcare workers to airborne virus in clinical environments. Lay summaryCOVID-19 patients exhale aerosol particles which can potentially carry infectious viruses into the hospital environment, putting healthcare workers at risk of infection. This risk can be reduced by proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to protect workers from virus exposure. More effective strategies, however, aim to provide source control, reducing the amount of virus-contaminated air that is exhaled into the hospital room. The McMonty isolation hood has been developed to trap and decontaminate the air around an infected patient. We tested the efficacy of the hood using a live virus model to mimic a COVID-19 patient in a hospital room. Using the McMonty hood reduced the amount of exhaled air particles in the room by over 109-times. In our tests, people working in the room were exposed to 374-times less infectious virus in the air, and room surfaces were 87-times less contaminated. Our study supports using devices like the McMonty hood in combination with PPE to keep healthcare workers safe from virus exposure at work.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exposition to airborne SARS-CoV-2 in household and hospitals settings as studied by a vacuum cleaner as a high-powered air sampler 96%
- Aerosol generation in children undergoing high flow nasal cannula therapy 95%
- Effectiveness of portable air filtration on reducing indoor aerosol counts: preclinical observational trials 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Aerosol SARS-CoV-2 in hospitals and long-term care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic 97%
- A simple, effective enclosure with disposable coverings for inexpensive containment of aerosolized COVID viruses during tracheal intubation and extubation 96%
- Evaluating Fomite Risk of Brown Paper Bags Storing Personal Protective Equipment Exposed to SARS-CoV-2: A Quasi-Experimental Study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators Remain Effective After Extensive Reuse During the COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
- A Comparison of Aerosol Mitigation Strategies and Aerosol Persistence in Dental Environments 93%
- Scalable In-hospital Decontamination of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator with a Peracetic Acid Room Disinfection System 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The removal of airborne SARS-CoV-2 and other microbial bioaerosols by air filtration on COVID-19 surge units 96%
- Frequency of routine testing for COVID-19 in high-risk environments to reduce workplace outbreaks 92%
- Infectious SARS-CoV-2 in Exhaled Aerosols and Efficacy of Masks During Early Mild Infection 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Personal protective equipment does not sufficiently protect against virus aerosol unless combined with advanced air purification or ventilation techniques 96%
- Comparable environmental stability and disinfection profiles of the currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 93%
- Surface and air contamination with SARS-CoV-2 from hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Toronto, Canada 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.