Mixed Methods Sequential Epidemiological Protocol (MMSEP) for Evaluation of Time Utilization by the Community Health Workers and Factors Affecting its Optimization
Kalne, P. S.; Joshi, S. H.; Kalne, P. S.; Mehendale, A. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundMany countries have a significant shortage of healthcare staff, resulting in a reduction in the range and quality of services. Low and middle-income countries rely heavily on Community Health Workers. Existing data suggests a lack of clarity regarding the scope of work as well as about the utilization of the working hours. The purpose of this work is to propose a protocol to evaluate the time utilization of the Community Health Workers and to identify the promoters and challenges that they come across while delivering their duties so that the workflow optimization processes can be hypothesized. MethodsThe Mixed Methods Sequential Epidemiological Protocol incorporates three phases. Phase I includes free listing to identify Community Health Workers workflow using a generic form with a single open-ended question for each cadre. After pile-sorting the free lists, the pile names should be used as categories for the time-motion study to be done in phase II. For each of these categories, time spent should be recorded and analyzed. Phase III includes in-depth interviews with Community Health Workers who use considerably varied times for the same category of work. DiscussionThe intended study will help in comparing the workflow of different cadres of health workers and finding out different factors promoting and inhibiting better utilization of their working hours. This approach will inform reasonable and feasible improvements to health-related planning of services and utilization of the health workforce and will help in increasing the efficiency of health workers to deliver services. Author contributions O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fddeb2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@27898dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b7997forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@be8ac2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@187fe54_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL C_TBL
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- How to attract and retain health workers in rural areas of a fragile state: findings from a labour market survey in Guinea 96%
- Protocol: Waiting time and ways of accessing specialized health services in public hospitals in Ecuador 96%
- COVID-19 self-testing in Nigeria: Stakeholders’ opinions and perspective on its value for case detection 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 95%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 94%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing the motivation of maternal health workers in conflict setting of Mogadishu, Somalia 97%
- Community-based newborn care intervention fidelity and its implementation drivers in South Wollo Zone, North-east Ethiopia 96%
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 95%
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 94%
- “My friends would believe my word”: appropriateness and acceptability of respondent-driven sampling in recruiting young tertiary student men who have sex with men for HIV/STI research in Nairobi, Kenya 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.