Back

Theory-based determinants of modern contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa: an analysis of demographic and health surveys

Adu-Gyamfi, R.; Enos, J.; Obiri-Yeboah, D.; Torpey, K.

2022-07-22 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2022.07.20.22277859 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionDespite improved access to modern contraceptives in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), the region has the highest fertility rate. Although modern contraceptive usage and its determinants in SSA have been assessed, most authors were not guided by behavioral change theories. This study sought to assess the modern contraceptive coverage in SSA and identify the theory-based determinants that need to be considered in demand creation interventions. MethodsData was obtained from the most recent demographic and health surveys conducted across 37 countries in SSA. Estimates of country-specific and pooled Regional modern contraceptive coverage were generated from 501,324 responses. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between modern contraceptive use and determinants selected based on the Health Belief and Social-Ecological behavior change models. ResultsModern contraceptive coverage in SSA was 22.26% (95% CI: 17.91, 26.60). The health belief model determinants of modern contraceptive use included last birth by caesarian section (AOR=1.44, 95% CI:1.31,1.59), hearing of family planning at the health facility (AOR=1.18, 95% CI:1.12,1.24), or from at least one media source, being able to negotiate condom use (AOR=1.65, 95% CI: 1.55,1.76), and having a previous terminated pregnancy (AOR=0.76, 95%CI: 0.71, 0.81). The social ecological model determinants of modern contraceptive use included being above 24 years, having at least primary education, non-urgent need for a last child, and being involved in decision-making concerning personal health (AOR=1.81,95% CI:1.71,1.92). DiscussionModern contraceptive coverage in SSA is low. Age, educational status, past obstetric history, exposure to family planning information, ability to negotiate condom use or make personal health-related decisions, and the need for a child were the determinants for modern contraceptive use in the region. Countries need to develop context-specific interventions considering these determinants to help improve coverage and reduce the poor maternal and child health outcomes and the developmental gaps resulting from unplanned pregnancies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.7%
3
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
6
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
7
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
9
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
11
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
13
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%
26
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%