Integrating large scale genetic and clinical information to predict cases of heart failure
Wu, K.-H. H.; Douville, N. J.; Yu, X.; Mathis, M. R.; Graham, S. E.; Global Biobank Meta-analysis Initiative (GBMI), ; Surakka, I.; Hornsby, W. E.; Willer, C. J.; Shi, X.
Show abstract
BackgroundHeart failure (HF) is a major cause of death globally. Prediction of HF risk and early initiation of treatment could mitigate disease progression. ObjectivesThe study aimed to improve the prediction accuracy of HF by integrating genome-wide association studies (GWAS)- and electronic health records (EHR)-derived risk scores. MethodsWe previously performed the largest HF GWAS to date within the Global Biobank Meta-analysis Initiative to create a polygenic risk score (PRS). To extract clinical information from high-dimensional EHR data, we treated diagnosis codes as words and leveraged natural language processing techniques to create a clinical risk score (ClinRS). Our method first learned code co-occurrence patterns and extracted 350 latent phenotypes (low-dimensional features) representing EHR codes, then used coefficients from regression of HF on the latent phenotypes in a training set as weights to calculate patient ClinRS in a validation set. Model performances were compared between baseline (age and sex) model and models with risk scores added: 1) PRS, 2) ClinRS, and 3) PRS+ClinRS. We further compared the proposed models with Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) heart failure risk score. ResultsResults showed that PRS and ClinRS were each able to predict HF outcomes significantly better than the baseline model, up to eight years prior to HF diagnosis. By including both PRS and ClinRS in the model, we achieved superior performance in predicting HF up to ten years prior to HF diagnosis, two years earlier than using a single risk predictor alone. Additionally, we found that ClinRS performed significantly better than ARIC model at one year prior to disease diagnosis. ConclusionsWe demonstrate the additive power of integrating GWAS- and EHR-derived risk scores to predict HF cases prior to diagnosis.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Multinational Validation of an Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Predicting Structural Heart Disease Using Noisy Single-lead Electrocardiograms 94%
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 93%
- Multimodal deep learning enhances diagnostic precision in left ventricular hypertrophy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of Digital Twins to Guide Interpretable AI for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Heart Failure 96%
- Cohort Design and Natural Language Processing to Reduce Bias in Electronic Health Records Research: The Community Care Cohort Project 95%
- Clinical Knowledge Extraction via Sparse Embedding Regression (KESER) with Multi-Center Large Scale Electronic Health Record Data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep representation learning for clustering longitudinal survival data from electronic health records 95%
- Genome-wide association analysis and Mendelian randomization proteomics identify novel protein biomarkers and drug targets for primary prevention of heart failure 95%
- Biomarker panels for improved risk prediction and enhanced biological insights in patients with atrial fibrillation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.