Back

A methodological framework to assess temporal trends and sub-national disparities in healthcare quality metrics using facility surveys, with applications to sick-child care in Kenya, Senegal, and Tanzania

Allorant, A.; Fullman, N.; Leslie, H. H.; Eliakimu, E.; Wakefield, J.; Dieleman, J. L.; Pigott, D.; Puttkammer, N.; Reiner, R. C.

2022-07-19 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2022.07.19.22276796 medRxiv
Show abstract

Monitoring healthcare quality at a subnational resolution is key to identify and resolve geographic inequities and ensure that no sub-population is left behind. Yet, health facility surveys are typically not powered to report reliable estimates at a subnational scale. In this study, we present a framework to fill this gap and jointly analyse publicly available facility survey data, allowing exploration of temporal trends and subnational disparities in healthcare quality metrics. Specifically, our Bayesian hierarchical model includes random effects to account for differences between survey instruments; space-time processes to leverage correlations in space and time; and covariates to incorporate auxiliary information. We apply this framework to Kenya, Senegal, and Tanzania - three countries with at least four rounds of standardized facility surveys each - and estimate the readiness and process quality of sick-child care over time and across subnational areas. These estimates of readiness and process quality of care over time and at a fine spatial resolution show uneven progress in improving facility-based service provision in Kenya, Senegal, and Tanzania. For instance, while national gains in overall readiness of care improved in Tanzania, geographic inequities persisted; in contrast, Senegal, and Kenya experienced stagnation in overall readiness at the national level, but disparities grew across subnational areas. Overall, providers adhered to about one-third of the clinical guidelines for managing sick-child illnesses at the national level. Yet across subnational units, such adherence greatly varied (e.g., 25% to 85% between counties of Kenya in 2020). Our new approach enables identifies precise estimation of changes in the spatial distribution of healthcare quality metrics over time, at a a programmatic spatial resolution, and with accompanying uncertainty estimates. Use of our framework will provide new insights at a policy-relevant spatial resolution for national and regional decision-makers, and international funders.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
22.3%
2
Biometrics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.9%
7
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
9
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
11
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%