Individual reference intervals in practice: A guide to personalise clinical and omics level data with IRIS
Pusparum, M.; Thas, O.; Ertaylan, G.
Show abstract
Reference intervals (RI) are the best-established methodology used for the interpretation of numerical clinical level data in healthcare and clinical practice. As the test results are interpreted by comparing with the (population-derived) reference intervals, the quality of the calculation and implementation of reference intervals play a major role in decision-making process at the subject level. Here we describe the IRIS workflow to compute Individual Reference Intervals (IRI) based on multiple "healthy" data points from the same subjects and also utilising peers test results. We have improved the IRI models so they allow for covariate adjustments, such as sex and age. The IRI is expected to play pivotal roles in i) early detection of disease transition in chronic diseases by facilitating the detection of small deviations in clinical measurements, ii) monitoring personal disease progression, either using the standard clinical biochemistry test results or the omics level data. We demonstrate the utility of IRI in clinical and omics level data (proteomics and metabolomics) from two different longitudinal studies, including prior data processing and data quality check procedures. We have created an integrated application IRIS incorporating all described steps in an easy-to-use tool in research and/or clinical practice. We compute the IRI estimates in a healthy population to demonstrate its diagnostic utility in chronic diseases and from a diseased cohort to demonstrate its potential in disease monitoring.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal response characterization across individual multiomics profiles of prediabetic and diabetic subjects 96%
- Finding disease modules for cancer and COVID-19 in gene co-expression networks with the Core&Peel method 94%
- Longitudinal pathway analysis using structural information with case studies in early type 1 diabetes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- metGWAS 1.0: An R workflow for network-driven over-representation analysis between independent metabolomic and meta-genome wide association studies 95%
- SGI: Automatic clinical subgroup identification in omics datasets 94%
- LimROTS: A Hybrid Method Integrating Empirical Bayes and Reproducibility-Optimized Statistics for Robust Differential Expression Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unsupervised Discovery of Risk Profiles on Negative and Positive COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients 93%
- Development of an absolute assignment predictor for triple-negative breast cancer subtyping using machine learning approaches 92%
- Enrichment analysis on regulatory subspaces: a novel direction for the superior description of cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trajectories: a framework for detecting temporal clinical event sequences from health data standardized to the OMOP Common Data Model 92%
- Characterizing subgroup performance of probabilistic phenotype algorithms within older adults: A case study for dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases 91%
- Physiological foundation modeling for subclinical disease assessment: a prospective pilot 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Individual Reference Intervals for Personalized Interpretation of Clinical and Metabolomics Measurements 93%
- Computational Strategies in Nutrigenetics: Constructing a Reference Dataset of Nutrition-Associated Genetic Polymorphisms 92%
- A methodology of phenotyping ICU patients from EHR data: high-fidelity, personalized, and interpretable phenotypes estimation 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.