Back

An Analysis of Oxycodone and Hydrocodone Distribution Trends in Delaware, Maryland, & Virginia between 2006-2014

Eufemio, C. M.; Hagedorn, J. D.; McCall, K. L.; Piper, B. J.

2022-07-17 pain medicine
10.1101/2022.07.16.22277708 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveUnderstanding opioid use and distribution trends by geographic area is critical in addressing the ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States. This study is a county level analysis of oxycodone and hydrocodone use in Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia between 2006-2014. Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis of oxycodone and hydrocodone distributed as collected by the Drug Enforcement Administrations (DEA) Washington Post Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System (ARCOS) in Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. Raw drug weights in each county were adjusted to "daily average dose" (grams/county population/365). Purchasing data collected from ARCOS was used to compare distribution trends during this period. ResultsThere was a 57.59% in the weight of oxycodone and hydrocodone between 2006-2014. Oxycodone prescriptions increased by 75.50% and hydrocodone by 11.05%. Oxycodone increased across all three states between 2006-2010 and declined until 2014. Hydrocodone also increased but to a lesser extent than oxycodone. There was substantial variability in daily average dose of both opioids at the county level in all states. Pharmacies accounted for largest portion of oxycodone (69.17%) and hydrocodone (75.27%) purchased in the region. Hospitals accounted for 26.67% of oxycodone and 22.76% hydrocodone purchased. Practitioners and mid-level providers did not significantly contribute to this increase. ConclusionIn the states of Maryland, Delaware, and Virginia, the distribution of the prescription opioids oxycodone and hydrocodone increased by 57.59%. Daily average dose increased between 2006-2010 in all three states followed by a decline until 2014. Variability in daily average dose by county highlights the relationship between geography and likelihood of receiving high dose opioids. It may further allude to effects of targeted distribution by pharmaceutical manufacturers and prescribing habits of geographically distinct healthcare entities. Relationships between location and opioid usage should continue to be investigated to promote rational use of controlled substances.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.0%
3
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.1%
6
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
10
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
11
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
12
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
13
Neurotherapeutics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
14
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
16
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
17
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
18
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
19
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
25
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%