Back

Differentiating interactions of antimicrobials with Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial cell walls using molecular dynamics simulations

Vaiwala, R.; Sharma, P.; Ayappa, K. G.

2022-07-16 biophysics
10.1101/2022.07.15.500204 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Developing molecular models to capture the complex physicochemical architecture of the bacterial cell wall and to study the interaction with antibacterial molecules is an important aspect of assessing and developing novel antimicrobial molecules. We carried out molecular dynamics simulations using an atomistic model of peptidoglycan (PGN) to represent the architecture for Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus. The model is developed to capture various structural features of the staphylococcal cell wall, such as the peptide orientation, area per disaccharide, glycan length distribution, crosslinking, and pore size. A comparison of the cell wall density and electrostatic potentials is made with a previously developed cell wall model of Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli, and properties for both a single and multilayered structures of the Staphylococcal cell wall are studied. We investigated the interactions of the antimicrobial peptide melittin with the PGN structures. The depth of melittin binding to PGN is more pronounced in E. coli than S. aureus, and consequently the melittin has greater contacts with glycan units of E. coli. Contacts of melittin with the amino acids of peptidoglycan are comparable across both the strains, and the D-Ala residues, which are sites for transpeptidation, show enhanced interactions with melittin. A low energetic barrier is observed for translocation thymol with the four-layered peptidoglycan model. The molecular model developed for Gram-positive PGN allows us to compare and contrast the cell wall penetrating properties with Gram-negative strains and assess for the first time binding and translocation of antimicrobial molecules for Gram-positive cell walls.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.5%
2
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.7%
3
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
5
Langmuir
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
6
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
7
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
9
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Biomacromolecules
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Soft Matter
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
13
Chemical Communications
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
14
Chemistry – A European Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
Nanoscale
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
16
The Journal of Chemical Physics
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
17
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.8%
21
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.6%
23
RSC Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.6%
25
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%