Conformational and Thermodynamic Differences Underlying Wild-type and Mutant YEATS Domain Specificity for Epigenetic Marks
Baweja, L.; Wereszczynski, J.
Show abstract
Histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) are interpreted by multiple reader domains and proteins to regulate gene expression. The ENL YEATS domain is a prototypical PTM reader that recognizes multiple lysine acetylation marks on the histone H3 tails as a way of recruiting chromatin remodellers. Two ENL YEATS mutations have been identified which have been linked with leukemia, Wilms tumor, and other forms of cancer and result in either an insertion or deletion of residues in the loop connecting beta sheets distant from the protein active site. In vitro experiments have shown that these mutations modulate the selectivity of YEATS domains for various lysine acetylation marks, although different experiments have provided contrasting views on the ability of the insertion and deletion mutants to discern specific PTMs. Here, we have performed multiple molecular dynamics simulations of wild-type, insertion, and deletion mutant YEATS domains free from and in complex with two PTM peptides: one that is acetylated at K9 of H3 and the other that is acetylated at residue K27 of H3. Results show that these two peptides have distinct flexibilities and binding energetics when bound to YEATS domains, and that these properties are affected by interactions with residues within and outside of the peptide consensus motif. Furthermore, these properties are modulated by the YEATS insertion and deletion mutants, which results in disparate binding effects in these systems. Together, these results suggest that only the partial exposure of histone tails is sufficient in the context of nucleosomes for YEATS-mediated recognition of acetylation marks on histone tails. They also caution against the over-interpretation of results obtained from experiments on reader domainhistone peptide binding in isolation and not in the full-length nucleosome context.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational Analysis of Energy Landscapes Reveals Dynamic Features that Contribute to Binding of Inhibitors to CFTR-Associated Ligand 96%
- Effects of Familial Alzheimer's Disease Mutations on the Folding Free Energy and Dipole-Dipole Interactions of the Amyloid β-Peptide 96%
- Microtubule severing enzymes oligomerization and allostery: a tale of two domains 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards In Situ Dynamics of DNA-bound Full-Length p53 Tetramer 96%
- Markov State Models and Perturbation-Based Approaches Reveal Distinct Dynamic Signatures and Hidden Allosteric Pockets in the Emerging SARS-Cov-2 Spike Omicron Variants Complexes with the Host Receptor: The Interplay of Dynamics and Convergent Evolution Modulates Allostery and Functional Mechanisms 96%
- Machine learning of molecular dynamics simulations provides insights into modulation of viral capsid assembly 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Oncogenic mutations in the DNA-binding domain of FOXO1 disrupt folding: quantitative insights from experiments and molecular simulations 96%
- A major disease-related point mutation in spastin alters dramatically the dynamics and allostery of the motor 96%
- Comparative Perturbation-Based Modeling of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Binding with Host Receptor and Neutralizing Antibodies : Structurally Adaptable Allosteric Communication Hotspots Define Spike Sites Targeted by Global Circulating Mutations 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of phosphorylation on protein backbone dynamics and conformational preferences 95%
- Dynamic Profiling of Binding and Allosteric Propensities of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein with Different Classes of Antibodies: Mutational and Perturbation-Based Scanning Reveal Allosteric Duality of Functionally Adaptable Hotspots 95%
- Prediction of fluorophore brightness in designed mini fluorescence activating proteins 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.