Back

Semantic and phonetic markers in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders; a combinatory machine learning approach

Voppel, A.; de Boer, J.; Brederoo, S.; Schnack, H.; Sommer, I. e. c.

2022-07-15 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2022.07.13.22277577 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionSpeech is a promising marker for schizophrenia-spectrum disorder diagnosis, as it closely reflects symptoms. Previous approaches have made use of different feature domains of speech in classification, including semantic and phonetic features. However, an examination of the relative contribution and accuracy per domain remains an area of active investigation. Here, we examine these domains (i.e. phonetic and semantic) separately and in combination. MethodsUsing a semi-structured interview with neutral topics, speech of 94 schizophrenia-spectrum subjects (SSD) and 73 healthy controls (HC) was recorded. Phonetic features were extracted using a standardized feature set, and transcribed interviews were used to assess word connectedness using a word2vec model. Separate cross-validated random forest classifiers were trained on each feature domain. A third, combinatory classifier was used to combine features from both domains. ResultsThe phonetic domain random forest achieved 81% accuracy in classifying SSD from HC. For the semantic domain, the classifier reached an accuracy of 80% with a sparse set of features with 10-fold cross-validation. Joining features from the domains, the combined classifier reached 85% accuracy, significantly improving on models trained on separate domains. Top features were fragmented speech for phonetic and variance of connectedness for semantic, with both being the top features for the combined classifier. DiscussionBoth semantic and phonetic domains achieved similar results compared with previous research. Combining these features shows the relative value of each domain, as well as the increased classification performance from implementing features from multiple domains. Explainability of models and their feature importance is a requirement for future clinical applications.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Schizophrenia
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
2
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
4
Schizophrenia Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
5
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
6
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.8%
9
Schizophrenia Bulletin
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Autism Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
13
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Journal of Psychiatric Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
15
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
16
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
19
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Hearing Research
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%