Greener Operations: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership on environmentally sustainable peri-operative practice
Clayton-Smith, M.; Narayanan, H.; Shelton, C. L.; Bates, L.; Brennan, F.; Deido, B.; Donnellon, D.; Dorey, J.; Evans, B.; Gower, J.; Hamdaoui, Y.; Hitchman, J.; Kinsella, S. M.; Knagg, R.; Lawson, C.; Morris, D.; Pegna, V.; Radcliffe, T.; Schaff, O.; Sheppard, T.; Strong, J.; Jones, D.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo agree the top 10 research priorities for environmentally sustainable peri-operative practice. Designsurveys and literature review; final consensus workshop using a nominal group technique. Setting: UK-based. Participantshealthcare professionals, patients, carers, and the public. Outcome measuresinitial survey- suggested research questions; interim survey- shortlist of indicative questions (the 20 most frequently nominated by patients, carers and the public, and healthcare professionals); final workshop- ranked research priorities. Resultsinitial survey- 1,926 suggestions by 296 respondents, refined into 60 indicative questions. Interim survey- 325 respondents. Final workshop- 21 participants agreed the top 10: O_LIHow can more sustainable reusable equipment safely be used during and around the time of an operation? C_LIO_LIHow can healthcare organisations more sustainably procure (obtain) medicines, equipment and items used during and around the time of an operation? C_LIO_LIHow can healthcare professionals who deliver care during and around the time of an operation be encouraged to adopt sustainable actions in practice? C_LIO_LICan more efficient use of operating theatres and associated practices reduce the environmental impact of operations? C_LIO_LIHow can the amount of waste generated during and around the time of an operation be minimised? C_LIO_LIHow do we measure and compare the short- and long-term environmental impacts of surgical and non-surgical treatments for the same condition? C_LIO_LIWhat is the environmental impact of different anaesthetic techniques (e.g., different types of general, regional and local anaesthesia) used for the same operation? C_LIO_LIHow should the environmental impact of an operation be weighed against its clinical outcomes and financial costs? C_LIO_LIHow can environmental sustainability be incorporated into the organisational management of operating theatres? C_LIO_LIWhat are the most sustainable forms of effective infection prevention and control used around the time of an operation (e.g., PPE, drapes, clean air ventilation)? C_LI Conclusionsa broad range of end-users have identified research priorities for sustainable peri-operative care. Strengths and Limitations of this StudyO_LIWe have defined the top 10 research priorities according to healthcare professionals, patients, carers, and members of the public, in an important and expanding area of health research. C_LIO_LITo our knowledge, this is the first research priority setting partnership in any field of sustainable healthcare. C_LIO_LIPatients, carers, and members of the public comprised 21% of survey respondents overall, a smaller proportion than in many priority setting partnerships. This may have been because of the online methods used (due in part to the COVID-19 pandemic) or the novel subject matter. C_LIO_LIThe James Lind Alliance process is consensus-based, transparent, and includes measures to ensure that patient, carer and public opinions are represented. C_LIO_LIThe scope of our work was limited to care provided from or in the secondary care setting to patients who may benefit from surgical management so does not include the full patient journey; more sustainability-focussed priority setting partnerships would be beneficial in the future. C_LI Original Protocol of the StudySee https://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/documents/greener-operations-sustainable-peri-operative-practice-psp-protocol/27106
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- How and why do Quality Circles work for General Practitioners - a realist approach 94%
- Mapping factors that may influence attrition and retention of midwives: a scoping review protocol 93%
- Frontline healthcare workers’ experiences with personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a rapid qualitative appraisal 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23 94%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
- Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? Protocol for a mixed method systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making 91%
- The Impact of Income Support Systems on Healthcare Quality and Functional Capacity in Workers with Low Back Pain: A Realist Review 89%
- Use of Powered Air-Purifying Respirator(PAPR) by healthcare workers for preventing highly infectious viral diseases -a systematic review of evidence 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The roadmap for implementing value based healthcare in European university hospitals - consensus report and recommendations 92%
- Validity, Reliability, and Framing Effects in Equity-Efficiency Trade-Off Studies: A Systematic Review 89%
- Loon Lens 1.0 Validation: Agentic AI for Title and Abstract Screening in Systematic Literature Reviews 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 94%
- Implementing essential diagnostics-learning from essential medicines: A scoping review 91%
- Let’s just ask them. Perspectives on urban dwelling and air quality: a cross-sectional survey of 3,222 children, young people and parents 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.