Retaining dermatology patients in primary care using dialogues with secondary care: A service evaluation
Brainard, J. S.; Crawford, A.; Wright, B.; Everden, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundWait list sizes for specialist secondary care have soared in recent years. Dermatology is a good candidate service for retaining patients in primary care and avoiding unnecessary waits to see a specialist. A dermatology dialogue service between primary and secondary care (DDPS) was developed in Norfolk and Waveney, eastern England. The service involved primary care referrers uploading patient images of skin complaints for review by and dialogue with secondary specialists to see if the patient could be retained in primary care, or should be referred to secondary care routinely, urgently or on the two week wait cancer pathway. ObjectivesTo evaluate service performance with respect to specific targets including reduction in secondary care wait list growth in the period March 2021-March 2022 inclusive. MethodsService activity was summarized with respect to speed of resolution, case counts and dispositions. Clinician and patient satisfaction were canvased with structured questionnaires. Actual new referral counts were compared to projections based on historical data. Wait list growth was compared to other specialisms and other areas. Wait times to receive first treatment at start and end of monitoring period were monitored. ResultsOver 3600 patients were enrolled in the DDPS system. Over 98% of cases were reported by the dermatologists within 36 hours. Clinician and patient satisfaction were high. Frequently asked questions and conditions were highlighted by dermatologists to design and deliver an educational event for primary care clinicians that was well received. Wait list growth to see dermatology in the commissioning area was smaller for dermatology than other large specialisms, and mostly smaller growth than dermatology wait lists commissioned by other NHS commissioners. Negative impact on the urgent priority (cancer pathway) wait list could not be observed. ConclusionsThe DDPS was satisfactory to clinicians and patients and coincided with smaller dermatology wait list growth than might otherwise have been expected.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Sunbed users aged 18-24 views on sunbed regulationpolicies in the UK. 92%
- Diagnostic value of cutaneous manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 infection 89%
- Effectiveness of four oral antifungal drugs (fluconazole, griseofulvin, itraconazole, terbinafine) in current epidemic of altered dermatophytosis in India: A randomized pragmatic trial 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is my cough a cold or covid? A qualitative study of COVID-19 symptom recognition and attitudes towards testing in the UK 89%
- Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyse large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: Comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques 88%
- Budget Impact Analysis Of The Introduction Of Ranibizumabs Biosimilar To The Jordanian Joint Procurement System. 87%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- What is the suitability of clinical vignettes in benchmarking the performance of online symptom checkers? An audit study 91%
- Understanding preferences for self-sampling in a national cervical screening programme: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment 91%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.