Back

Executed and imagined grasping movements can be decoded from lower dimensional representation of distributed non-motor brain areas.

Ottenhoff, M. C.; Verwoert, M.; Goulis, S.; Colon, A.; Wagner, L.; Tousseyn, S.; van Dijk, J. P.; Kubben, P.; Herff, C.

2022-07-04 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.07.04.498676 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Using brain activity directly as input for assistive tool control can circumvent muscular dysfunction and increase functional independence for physically impaired people. Most invasive motor decoding studies focus on decoding neural signals from the primary motor cortex, which provides a rich but superficial and spatially local signal. Initial non-primary motor cortex decoding endeavors have used distributed recordings to demonstrate decoding of motor activity by grouping electrodes in mesoscale brain regions. While these studies show that there is relevant and decodable movement related information outside the primary motor cortex, these methods are still exclusionary to other mesoscale areas, and do not capture the full informational content of the motor system. In this work, we recorded intracranial EEG of 8 epilepsy patients, including all electrode contacts except those contacts in or adjacent to the central sulcus. We show that executed and imagined movements can be decoded from non-motor areas; combining all non-motor contacts into a lower dimensional representation provides enough information for a Riemannian decoder to reach an area under the curve of 0.83 {+/-} 0.11. Additionally, by training our decoder on executed and testing on imagined movements, we demonstrate that between these two conditions there exists shared distributed information in the beta frequency range. By combining relevant information from all areas into a lower dimensional representation, the decoder was able to achieve high decoding results without information from the primary motor cortex. This representation makes the decoder more robust to perturbations, signal non-stationarities and neural tissue degradation. Our results indicate to look beyond the motor cortex and open up the way towards more robust and more versatile brain-computer interfaces.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.2%
2
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
5
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
6
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
7
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.2%
10
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
12
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
13
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
14
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
16
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%