Candidate targets of copy number deletion events across 17 cancer types
Huang, Q.; Baudis, M.
Show abstract
Genome variation is the direct cause of cancer and driver of its clonal evolution. While the impact of many point mutations can be evaluated through their modification of individual genomic elements, even a single copy number aberration (CNA) may encompass hundreds of genes and therefore pose challenges to untangle potentially complex functional effects. However, consistent, recurring and disease-specific patterns in the genome-wide CNA landscape imply that particular CNA may promote cancer-type-specific characteristics. Discerning essential cancer-promoting alterations from the inherent co-dependency in CNA would improve the understanding of mechanisms of CNA and provide new insights into cancer biology and potential therapeutic targets. Here we implement a model using segmental breakpoints to discover non-random gene coverage by copy number deletion (CND). With a diverse set of cancer types from multiple resources, this model identified common and cancer-type-specific oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes as well as cancer-promoting functional pathways. Confirmed by differential expression analysis of data from corresponding cancer types, the results show that for most cancer types, despite dissimilarity of their CND landscapes, similar canonical pathways are affected. In 25 analyses of 17 cancer types, we have identified 19 to 169 significant genes by copy deletion, including RB1, PTEN and CDKN2A as the most significantly deleted genes among all cancer types. We have also shown a shared dependence on core pathways for cancer progression in different cancers as well as cancer type separation by genome-wide significance scores. While this work provides a reference for gene specific significance in many cancers, it chiefly contributes a general framework to derive genomewide significance and molecular insights in CND profiles with a potential for the analysis of rare cancer types as well as non-coding regions.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cancer metabolic subtypes and their association with molecular and clinical features 95%
- COL7A1 expression improves prognosis prediction for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma atop of stage 94%
- A novel molecular analysis approach in colorectal cancer suggests new treatment opportunities 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel candidates of pathogenic variants of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in a 3,552 Japanese whole-genome sequence dataset (3.5KJPNv2) 95%
- Assessing reliability of intra-tumor heterogeneity estimates from single sample whole exome sequencing data 94%
- Crinet: A computational tool to infer genome-wide competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) interactions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.