Evaluating a novel, integrative dashboard for health professionals performance in managing deteriorating patients: quality improvement project
Alhmoud, B. A.; Melley, D.; Khan, N.; Bonicci, T.; Patel, R.; Banerjee, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe quality of recording and documentation of deteriorating patient management by health professionals has been challenged at health system level during the COVID-19 pandemic. Non-adherence to monitoring and escalation guidelines and poor documentation increases risk of serious adverse events. Electronic health record (EHR)-integrated dashboards are real-time auditing tools of patients status and clinicians performance, but neither the views nor the performance of health professionals have been assessed, relating to management of deteriorating patients.. ObjectiveTo develop and evaluate a real-time dashboard of deteriorating patients assessment, referral, and therapy by examining the perception of the dashboard and the performance of nurses and physicians. SettingsFive academic hospitals in the largest NHS trust in the UK (Barts Health NHS Trust). InterventionThe dashboard was developed from EHR data to investigate patients with NEWS2>5, assessment, and escalation of deteriorating patients. We adopted the Plan, Do, Study, Act model and followed the SQUIRE framework to evaluate the dashboard. DesignMixed methods: (i) Virtual, face-to-face, key informant interviews and (ii) Retrospective descriptive EHR data analysis to measure performance change over time. ResultsWe interviewed 3 nurses (2 quality and safety and 1 informatics specialists). Key themes were: (1) participants perceived the dashboard as a facilitator for auditing NEWS2 recording and escalation of care to improve clinicians practice; (2) There is a need for guiding clinicians and adjusting data sources and metrics which could enhance the functionality and usability. From EHR (2019 to 2022) data analysis showed: (1) NEWS2 recording has gradually improved in the implementation and evaluation phases (May 2021 to Apr 2022) from 64% to 83%; (2) Referral and nurses assessment forms completion increased (n: 170 to 6800 & 23 to 540, respectively). ConclusionThe deterioration dashboard is an effective real time data-driven method for improving the quality of managing deteriorating patients. Improving the dashboard by integrating multiple health systems, a wider analysis of further NEWS2 and escalation of care metrics, clinicians learning of digital solutions will enhance functionality and experience, potentially boosting its value. There is a need to examine the generalizability of the dashboard through further validation and quality improvement studies.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 95%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 94%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physician experiences of electronic health records interoperability and its practical impact on care delivery in the English NHS: A cross-sectional survey study 96%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 96%
- Performance of the Safer Nursing Care Tool to measure nurse staffing requirements in acute hospitals: a multi-centre observational study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Completion of electronic nursing documentation of inpatient admission assessment: insights from Australian metropolitan hospitals 95%
- Development and Evaluation of MADDIE: Method to Acquire Delivery Date Information from Electronic Health Records 92%
- Digital applications to support self-management of multimorbidity: A scoping review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding how the design and implementation of Online Consultations influence primary care outcomes: Systematic review of evidence with recommendations for designers, providers, and researchers 94%
- Design and implementation of a system for automated monitoring of adherence to evidenced-based clinical guideline recommendations 94%
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 95%
- Hospital at home: a systematic review of how medication management is conceptualised, described and implemented in practice – a study protocol 94%
- Essential Indicators of Quality in Primary Care Settings: An Evidence-Based, Structured, Expert Approach 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.