Back

A model-based analysis reveals three-dimensional genome organization heterogeneity and functional sub-compartments in cell populations

Zheng, X.; Tran, J. R.; Zheng, Y.

2022-06-30 bioinformatics
10.1101/2022.06.27.497761 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The computational inference of genome organization based on Hi-C sequencing has greatly aided the understanding of chromatin and nuclear organization in three dimensions (3D). However, existing computational methods used to infer sub-compartments from Hi-C data fail to address the cell population heterogeneity. Here we describe a model-based method, called CscoreTool-M, which uses probabilistic modeling to build multiple 3D genome sub-compartments from Hi-C data. The compartment scores inferred using CscoreTool-M directly represents the probability of a genomic region locating in a specific sub-compartment. Compared to published methods, CscoreTool-M is more accurate in inferring local sub-compartment containing heterochromatin marked by Histone lysine trimethylation (H3K27me3) surrounded by the actively transcribed euchromatic regions. The compartment scores calculated by CscoreTool-M also help to quantify the levels of heterogeneity in sub-compartment localization within cell populations for different genomic regions. By comparing proliferating cells and terminally differentiated non-proliferating cells, we show that the proliferating cells have higher genome organization heterogeneity, which is likely caused by cells at different cell-cycle stages. By analyzing 10 sub-compartments, we found a sub-compartment containing chromatin potentially related to the early-G1 chromatin regions proximal to the nuclear lamina in HCT116 cells, suggesting the method can deconvolve cell cycle stage-specific genome organization among asynchronously dividing cells. Finally, we show that CscoreTool-M can further identify sub-compartments that contain genes enriched in housekeeping or cell-type-specific functions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.