Effects of Beaver (Castor canadensis) Herbivory and Wildfire on Foliage Density and Woody Debris, San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area, Arizona
Radke, M. F.
Show abstract
Beaver (Castor canadensis) were reintroduced beginning in 1999 on the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area. Herbivory is the most obvious effect from beaver, but little research exists of herbivory effects after reintroduction. Fire processes may also have substantial effects to vegetation, and both beaver and fire are important ecological components for comparing effects and subsequent management decisions. The objective of this research, conducted during 2008 and 2009, was to determine any effects to foliage density caused by beaver herbivory and wildfire as compared to control sites. There were significant differences in foliage density between control, beaver, and wildfire sites, with lower foliage density and greater above-ground heights associated with wildfire sites. Although near the significance level, there were no interactions between control, beaver, or wildfire sites for changes in foliage density at different heights. Mean Fremont cottonwood, Gooddings willow, and seep willow foliage density was significantly different between control, beaver, and fire sites. Fremont cottonwood had significantly higher foliage density at control sites than at fire sites, but not between control and beaver sites or between beaver and fire sites. Gooddings willow density was significantly higher at control and beaver sites than fire sites, with no significant difference between control and beaver sites. Seep willow foliage density was significantly higher at control and beaver sites compared to fire sites, but not significantly different between control and beaver sites. Mean downed and dead wood cover was not significantly different between control, beaver, and fire-influenced sites, between beaver and control sites, between control and fire sites, or between beaver and fire sites. Management implications include more strategic wildfire planning and preparedness, achieved through integrated tamarisk control in the riparian area and use of prescribed fire in upland habitats to reduce fire size and severity that threaten the riparian gallery forest and its ecosystem services.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multidecadal decline and recovery of aspen experiencing contrasting fire regimes: long-unburned, infrequent and frequent mixed-severity wildfire 97%
- Resilience of riparian vegetation composition and diversity following cessation of livestock grazing in northeastern Oregon, USA 95%
- Driving factors of conifer regeneration dynamics in eastern Canadian boreal old-growth forests 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Land-use history impacts spatial patterns and composition of woody plant species across a 35-hectare temperate forest plot 94%
- Characterization of habitat requirements of European fishing spiders 92%
- Living Shorelines Achieve Functional Equivalence to Natural Fringe Marshes across Multiple Ecological Metrics 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scaling up tree diversity inventories across Amazonian ecosystems using field spectroscopy 93%
- Between a rock and a hard place: Effects of land-use change on rock-dwelling animals of lateritic plateaus in the northern Western Ghats 92%
- Biotic Assessment of Crowdsourced Data Defines Four Ecoregions in Thar: A Novel Approach for Citizen Engagement in Conservation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Big trees drive forest structure patterns across a lowland Amazon regrowth gradient 92%
- Predicting range shifts of three endangered endemic plants of the Khorassan-Kopet Dagh floristic province under global change 92%
- Does rainforest biodiversity stand on the shoulders of giants? Effect of disturbances by forest elephants on trees and insects on Mount Cameroon 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.