Back

The slow evolving genome of the xenacoelomorph worm Xenoturbella bocki

Schiffer, P. H.; Natsidis, P.; Leite, D. J.; Robertson, H.; Lapraz, F.; Marletaz, F.; Fromm, B.; Baudry, L.; Simpson, F.; Hoye, E.; Zakrzewski, A.-C.; Kapli, P.; Hoff, K. J.; Mueller, S.; Marbouty, M.; Marlow, H.; Copley, R. H.; Sarkies, P.; Telford, M. J.

2022-06-27 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2022.06.24.497508 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The evolutionary origins of Bilateria remain enigmatic. One of the more enduring proposals highlights similarities between a cnidarian-like planula larva and simple acoel-like flatworms. This idea is based in part on the view of the Xenacoelomorpha as an outgroup to all other bilaterians which are themselves designated the Nephrozoa (protostomes and deuterostomes). Genome data can help to elucidate phylogenetic relationships and provide important comparative data. Here we assemble and analyse the genome of the simple, marine xenacoelomorph Xenoturbella bocki, a key species for our understanding of early bilaterian and deuterostome evolution. Our highly contiguous genome assembly of X. bocki has a size of [~]111 Mbp in 18 chromosome like scaffolds, with repeat content and intron, exon and intergenic space comparable to other bilaterian invertebrates. We find X. bocki to have a similar number of genes to other bilaterians and to have retained ancestral metazoan synteny. Key bilaterian signalling pathways are also largely complete and most bilaterian miRNAs are present. We conclude that X. bocki has a complex genome typical of bilaterians, in contrast to the apparent simplicity of its body plan. Overall, our data do not provide evidence supporting the idea that Xenacoelomorpha are a primitively simple outgroup to other bilaterians and gene presence/absence data support a relationship with Ambulacraria.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.5%
2
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.0%
3
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
4
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
5
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
8
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.9%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
11
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
12
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
16
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
18
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
EvoDevo
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
28
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
29
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%