Back

High content image analysis in routine diagnostic histopathology predicts outcomes in HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas

Hue, J.; Valinciute, Z.; Thavaraj, S.; Veschini, L.

2022-06-26 pathology
10.1101/2022.06.24.22276368 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveRoutine haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) photomicrographs from human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (HPV+OpSCC) contain a wealth of prognostic information. In this study, we set out to develop a high content image analysis workflow to quantify features of H&E images from HPV+OpSCC patients to identify prognostic features which can be used for prediction of patient outcomes. MethodsWe have developed a dedicated image analysis workflow using open-source software, for single-cell segmentation and classification. This workflow was applied to a set of 567 images from diagnostic H&E slides in a retrospective cohort of HPV+OpSCC patients with favourable (n = 29) and unfavourable (n = 29) outcomes. Using our method, we have identified 31 quantitative prognostic features which were quantified in each sample and used to train a neural network model to predict patient outcomes. The model was validated by k-fold cross-validation using 10 folds and a test set. ResultsUnivariate and multivariate statistical analyses revealed significant differences between the two patient outcome groups in 31 and 16 variables respectively (P<0.05). The neural network model had an overall accuracy of 78.8% and 77.7% in recognising favourable and unfavourable prognosis patients when applied to the test set and k-fold cross-validation respectively. ConclusionOur open-source H&E analysis workflow and model can predict HPV+OpSCC outcomes with promising accuracy. Our work supports the use of machine learning in digital pathology to exploit clinically relevant features in routine diagnostic pathology without additional biomarkers.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.