Back

Explicitly Nonlinear Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity In Resting-State fMRI Data

Motlaghian, S.; Belger, A.; Bustillo, J.; Ford, J.; Iraji, A.; Lim, K.; Mathalon, D.; Mueller, B.; O'Leary, D.; Pearlson, G.; Potkin, S.; Preda, A.; van Erp, T.; Calhoun, V.

2022-06-26 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.06.22.497262 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Most dynamic functional connectivity in fMRI data is focused on linear correlations, and to our knowledge, no study has studied whole brain explicitly nonlinear dynamic relationships within the data. While some approaches have attempted to study overall connectivity more generally using flexible models, we are particularly interested in whether the non-linear relationships, above and beyond linear, are capturing unique information. This study thus proposes an approach to assess the explicitly nonlinear dynamic functional network connectivity derived from the relationship among independent component analysis time courses. Linear relationships were removed at each time point to evaluate, typically ignored, explicitly nonlinear dFNC using normalized mutual information. Simulations showed the proposed method accurately estimated NMI over time, even within relatively short windows of data. Results on fMRI data included 151 schizophrenia patients, and 163 healthy controls showed three unique, highly structured, mostly long-range, functional states that also showed significant group differences. This analysis identifies a higher level of explicitly nonlinear dependencies in transient connectivity within the visual network in healthy controls compared to schizophrenia patients. In particular, nonlinear relationships tend to be more widespread than linear ones. We also find highly significant differences in the relative co-occurrence of linear and explicitly nonlinear states in HC and SZ, suggesting these may be an important aspect of the disorder. Overall, this work suggests that quantifying nonlinear dependencies of dynamic functional connectivity may provide a complementary and potentially valuable tool for studying brain function by exposing relevant variation that is typically ignored.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Connectivity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.1%
4
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.4%
5
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
12
Brain Imaging and Behavior
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
14
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
Cognitive Neurodynamics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
17
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Brain Topography
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Schizophrenia Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
29
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%