Back

Genome-resolved analyses show an extensive diversification in key aerobic hydrocarbon-degrading enzymes across bacteria and archaea

Somee, M. R.; Amoozegar, M. A.; Dastgheib, S. M. M.; Shavandi, M.; Maman, L. G.; Bertilsson, S.; Mehrshad, M.

2022-06-22 microbiology
10.1101/2022.06.22.496985 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hydrocarbons (HCs) are organic compounds composed solely of carbon and hydrogen. They mainly accumulate in oil reservoirs, but aromatic HCs can also have other sources and are widely distributed in the biosphere. Our perception of pathways for biotic degradation of major HCs and genetic information of key enzymes in these bioconversion processes have mainly been based on cultured microbes and are biased by uneven taxonomic representation. Here we use Annotree to provide a gene-centric view of aerobic degradation of aliphatic and aromatic HCs in a total of 23446 genomes from 123 bacterial and 14 archaeal phyla. Apart from the widespread genetic potential for HC degradation in Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, Bacteroidota, and Firmicutes, genomes from an additional 18 bacterial and 3 archaeal phyla also hosted key HC degrading enzymes. Among these, such degradation potential has not been previously reported for representatives in the phyla UBA8248, Tectomicrobia, SAR324, and Eremiobacterota. While genomes containing full pathways for complete degradation of HCs were only detected in Proteobacteria and Actinobacteriota, other lineages capable of mediating such key steps could partner with representatives with truncated HC degradation pathways and collaboratively drive the process. Phylogeny reconstruction shows that the reservoir of key aerobic hydrocarbon-degrading enzymes in Bacteria and Archaea undergoes extensive diversification via gene duplication and horizontal gene transfer. This diversification could potentially enable microbes to rapidly adapt to novel and manufactured HCs that reach the environment.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.