Back

Non-catastrophic collapse of VEEV by lethal mutagenesis

Alejandro, B.; Kim, E. J.; Hwang, J. Y.; Park, J. W.; Smith, M.; Chung, D.

2022-06-21 microbiology
10.1101/2022.06.21.496950 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RNA viruses replicate at a high mutation rate, providing a highly adaptive capacity to the population as well as vulnerability to an extinction due to additional mutations, which is the conceptual basis for lethal mutagenesis. However, the mechanistic understanding of lethal mutagenesis has remained unclear due to the lack of RNA mutagens with potent antiviral activity and the inherent inability to distinguish between infectious and non-infectious sub-populations within a viral population. In our study, we investigated how the replication competency and mutation frequency of Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus (VEEV) change following treatment with the RNA mutagen {beta}-d-N4-hydroxycytidine, a potent antiviral RNA mutagen. By pairing limiting dilution with a long-read sequencing approach, we specifically determined genomic sequences of replication-competent viral clones from the total population. We found that replication-competent VEEV population maintained itself within a narrow mutation spectrum with a significantly lower mutation frequency than the total population. We also found that treatment with an RNA mutagen did not induce catastrophic destruction of the infectious population even at a high exposure, allowing replication-competent subpopulations with increased variability in mutational fitness and enhanced adaptability to new selection pressures, such as antiviral treatment, to continue to propagate. Together our study provides new understanding of viral population landscape and suggests a careful consideration of lethal mutagenesis as an antiviral strategy for high-capacity replicating viruses such as alphaviruses.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.