Trends in Clinical Validation and Usage of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-Cleared Artificial Intelligence (AI) Algorithms for Medical Imaging
Khunte, M.; Chae, A.; Wang, R.; Jain, R.; Sun, Y.; Sollee, J.; Jiao, Z.; Bai, H.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to examine the current landscape of FDA-approved AI medical imaging devices and identify trends in clinical validation strategy. Materials and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study that analyzed data extracted from the American College of Radiology (ACR) Data Science Institute AI Central database as of November 2021 to identify trends in FDA clearance of AI products related to medical imaging. Product and clinical validation information of each device was gathered from their respective public 510(k) summary or de novo request submission, depending on their type of authorization. ResultsOverall, the database included a total of 151 AI algorithms that were cleared by the FDA between 2008 and November 2021. Out of the 151 FDA summaries reviewed, 97 (64.2%) reported the use of clinical data to validate their device. Of these 151 summaries, 81 (53.6%) reported the total number of patient cases used during validation, with the average number of cases being 799 (SD: 1363) and the range of cases spanning from 15 to 9122. A total of 51 (33.8%) AI devices characterized their clinical data as multicenter, 3 (2.0%) as single-center, and the remaining 97 (64.2%) did not specify. The ground truth used for clinical validation was specified in 78 (51.6%) FDA summaries. Discussion and ConclusionA wide breadth of AI algorithms have been developed for medical imaging. Most of the devices FDA summaries mention their use of clinical data and patient cases for device validation, emphasizing their utility in real clinical practice.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis 94%
- Evaluating Large Language Model-Generated Brain MRI Protocols: Performance of GPT4o, o3-mini, DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5-72B 92%
- Impact of Non-Contrast Enhanced Imaging Input Sequences on the Generation of Virtual Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI Scans using Neural Networks 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation 94%
- Regulatory-approved Deep Learning/Machine Learning-Based Medical Devices in Japan as of 2020: A Systematic Review 93%
- Implementation and prospective real-time evaluation of a generalized system for in-clinic deployment and validation of machine learning models in radiology 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 93%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 92%
- SCU-Net: A deep learning method for segmentation and quantification of breast arterial calcifications on mammograms 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.