Back

Denoising Approach Affects Diagnostic Differences in Brain Connectivity across the Alzheimer's Disease Continuum

Blujus, J. K.; Oh, H.; ADNI,

2022-06-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.06.16.496466 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Graph theory provides a promising technique to investigate Alzheimers disease (AD)-related alterations in brain connectivity. However, discrepancies exist in the reported disruptions that occur to network topology across the AD continuum, which may be attributed to differences in the denoising approach used in fMRI processing to remove the effect of non-neuronal sources from signal. The current study aimed to determine if diagnostic differences in graph metrics were dependent on nuisance regression strategy. Sixty cognitively normal (CN), 60 MCI, and 40 AD matched for age, sex, and motion, were selected from the ADNI database for analysis. Resting state images were preprocessed using AFNI (v21.2.04) and 16 nuisance regression approaches were employed, which included the unique combination of four nuisance regressors (derivatives of the realignment parameters, motion censoring [euclidean norm > 0.3mm], outlier censoring [outlier fraction > .10], bandpass filtering [0.01 - 0.1 Hz]). Graph metrics representing network segregation (clustering coefficient, local efficiency, modularity), network integration (largest connected component, path length, local efficiency), and small-worldness (clustering coefficient/path length) were calculated. The results showed a significant interaction between diagnosis and nuisance approach on path length, such that diagnostic differences were only evident when motion derivatives and censoring of both motion and outlier volumes were applied. Further, regardless of the denoising approach, AD patients exhibited less segregated networks and lower small-worldness than CN and MCI. Finally, independent of diagnosis, denoising strategy significantly affected the magnitude of nearly all metrics (except local efficiency), such that models including bandpass filtering had higher graph metrics than those without. These findings suggest the relative robustness of network segregation and small-worldness properties to denoising strategy. However, caution should be taken when interpreting path length findings across studies, as subtle variations in regression approach may account for discrepancies. Continued efforts should be taken towards harmonizing preprocessing pipelines across studies to aid replication efforts and build consensus towards understanding the mechanisms underlying pathological aging.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Connectivity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
2
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.9%
3
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.0%
5
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
7
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
8
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
9
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
12
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
13
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.4%
16
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
17
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
18
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
20
NeuroImage: Reports
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Neurobiology of Aging
107 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Brain Informatics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
Brain Imaging and Behavior
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%