Mental health of healthcare workers in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal cohort study
Lamb, D.; Gafoor, R.; Scott, H.; Carr, E.; Stevelink, S.; Raine, R.; Hotopf, M.; Greenberg, N.; Hegarty, S.; Madan, I.; Moran, P.; Morriss, R.; Murphy, D.; Rafferty, A. M.; Weich, S.; Dorrington, S.; Wessely, S.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo examine variations in impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of all types of healthcare workers (HCWs) in England over the first 17 months of the pandemic. MethodWe undertook a prospective cohort study of 22,501 HCWs from 18 English acute and mental health NHS Trusts, collecting online survey data on common mental disorders (CMDs), depression, anxiety, alcohol use, and PTSD, from April 2020 to August 2021. We analysed these data cross-sectionally by time period (corresponding to periods the NHS was under most pressure), and longitudinally. Data were weighted to better represent Trust population demographics. ResultsThe proportion of those with probable CMDs was greater during periods when the NHS was under most pressure (measured by average monthly deaths). For example, 55% (95%CI 53%, 58%) of participants reported symptoms of CMDs in April-June 2020 versus 47% (95%CI 46%, 48%) July-October 2020. Contrary to expectation, there were no major differences between professional groups (i.e. clinical and non-clinical staff). Younger, female, lower paid staff, who felt poorly supported by colleagues/managers, and who experienced potentially morally injurious events were most at risk of negative mental health outcomes. ConclusionAmong HCWs, the prevalence of probable CMDs increased during periods of escalating pressure on the NHS, suggesting staff support should be increased at such points in the future, and staff should be better prepared for such situations via training. All staff, regardless of role, experienced poorer mental health during these periods, suggesting that support should be provided for all staff groups. Key messagesO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSExisting evidence about the mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs) through the COVID-19 pandemic comes mainly from cross-sectional studies using unrepresentative convenience samples, typically focussing on clinical staff rather than all HCWs. Such studies show high prevalence of symptoms of mental disorders, but the strength of this evidence is uncertain. What this study addsUsing a defined sampling frame, with longitudinal, weighted data, we show that during periods of greater pressure on the NHS (as indicated by average monthly national COVID-19 death rates), prevalence of mental disorder symptoms increased, and, importantly, that this effect was seen in non-clinical as well as clinical staff. How this study might affect research, practice or policyThese findings indicate that provision of support for HCWs should not only focus on those providing clinical care, but also on non-clinical staff such as porters, cleaners, and administrative staff, and additional support should be provided during higher pressure periods. Better preparation of staff for such situations is also suggested.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-harm during the early period of the COVID-19 Pandemic in England: comparative trend analysis of hospital presentations 95%
- The prevalence of probable mental health disorders among hospital healthcare workers during COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Experiences in Patients with Common Mental Disorders Attending the UK Primary Care Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) Programme 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health and wellbeing of UK healthcare workers 97%
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 96%
- Did social factors buffer against the effect of adversities on self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic? A longitudinal analysis of 49,227 UK adults 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing mental health trajectories of four different types of key workers with non-key workers: A 12-month follow-up observational study of 21,874 adults in England during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Ethnic inequalities in compulsory psychiatric hospital detentions during UK COVID-19 'lockdowns': A Regression Discontinuity Design in time study 94%
- The impact of shielding during the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health: Evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on 4,378 UK healthcare workers and ancillary staff: initial baseline data from a cohort study collected during the first wave of the pandemic 97%
- Ethnic inequalities among NHS staff in England - workplace experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Inequalities in NHS Staff Support among those from Ethnic Minority and Migrant groups during the COVID-19 Pandemic. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The mental health impact of COVID-19 and pandemic related stressors among adults in the UK 94%
- Tracking the mental health of home-carers during the first COVID-19 national lockdown: evidence from a nationally representative UK survey 94%
- Longitudinal changes in home confinement and mental health implications: A 17-month follow-up study in England during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.