Overt and occult hypoxemia in patients hospitalized with novel coronavirus disease 2019
Gadrey, S. M.; Mohanty, P.; Haughey, S. P.; Jacobsen, B. A.; Dubester, K. J.; Webb, K. M.; Kowalski, R. L.; Dreicer, J. J.; Andris, R. T.; Clark, M. T.; Moore, C. C.; Holder, A.; Kamaleswaran, R.; Ratcliffe, S. J.; Moorman, J. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundProgressive hypoxemia is the predominant mode of deterioration in COVID-19. Among hypoxemia measures, the ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F ratio) has optimal construct validity but poor availability because it requires arterial blood sampling. Pulse oximetry reports oxygenation continuously, but occult hypoxemia can occur in Black patients because the technique is affected by skin color. Oxygen dissociation curves allow non-invasive estimation of P/F ratios (ePFR) but this approach remains unproven. Research QuestionCan ePFRs measure overt and occult hypoxemia? Study Design and methodsWe retrospectively studied COVID-19 hospital encounters (n=5319) at two academic centers (University of Virginia [UVA] and Emory University). We measured primary outcomes (death or ICU transfer within 24 hours), ePFR, conventional hypoxemia measures, baseline predictors (age, sex, race, comorbidity), and acute predictors (National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and Sepsis-3). We updated predictors every 15 minutes. We assessed predictive validity using adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and area under receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROC). We quantified disparities (Black vs non-Black) in empirical cumulative distributions using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) two-sample test. ResultsOvert hypoxemia (low ePFR) predicted bad outcomes (AOR for a 100-point ePFR drop: 2.7 [UVA]; 1.7 [Emory]; p<0.01) with better discrimination (AUROC: 0.76 [UVA]; 0.71 [Emory]) than NEWS (AUROC: 0.70 [UVA]; 0.70 [Emory]) or Sepsis-3 (AUROC: 0.68 [UVA]; 0.65 [Emory]). We found racial differences consistent with occult hypoxemia. Black patients had better apparent oxygenation (K-S distance: 0.17 [both sites]; p<0.01) but, for comparable ePFRs, worse outcomes than other patients (AOR: 2.2 [UVA]; 1.2 [Emory], p<0.01). InterpretationThe ePFR was a valid measure of overt hypoxemia. In COVID-19, it may outperform multi-organ dysfunction models like NEWS and Sepsis-3. By accounting for biased oximetry as well as clinicians real-time responses to it (supplemental oxygen adjustment), ePFRs may enable statistical modelling of racial disparities in outcomes attributable to occult hypoxemia.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Utility of skin tone on pulse oximetry in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study 94%
- Cardiovascular disease and severe hypoxemia associated with higher rates of non-invasive respiratory support failure in COVID-19 93%
- ABCDEF Bundle Implementation: The influence of access to bundle-enhancing supplies and equipment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hemodynamic profiles by non-invasive monitoring of cardiac index and vascular tone in acute heart failure patients in the emergency department: external validation and clinical outcomes 95%
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 94%
- SOFA score performs worse than age for predicting mortality in patients with COVID-19 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- An international factorial vignette-based survey of intubation decisions in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure 94%
- Accuracy of a Risk Alert Threshold for ICU Hypoglycemia: Retrospective Analysis of Alert Performance and Association with Clinical Deterioration Events 93%
- Prone Positioning in a North American Cohort of Hypoxemic Patients on Mechanical Ventilation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Imputation of PaO2 from SpO2 values from the MIMIC-III Critical Care Database Using Machine-Learning Based Algorithms 97%
- Descriptive characteristics of continuous oximetry measurement in moderate to severe COVID-19 patients 94%
- Machine learning vs. traditional regression analysis for fluid overload prediction in the ICU 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP): An Interpretable Machine Learning AutoScore–Derived Triage Tool for Predicting Mortality after Emergency Admissions 94%
- Consistency of performance of adverse outcome prediction models for hospitalized COVID-19 patients 93%
- Prospective and External Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict In-Hospital Mortality 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.