Back

The effect of floral symmetry and orientation on the consistency of pollinator's entry angle

Jirgal, N.; Ohashi, K.

2022-06-09 plant biology
10.1101/2022.06.09.495424 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Since the publication of Sprengels (1793) observations, it has been considered that flowers with zygomorphic (or bilaterally symmetrical) corollas evolved to restrict the movement of pollinators into the flower by limiting the pollinators direction of approach. However, little empirical support has been accumulated so far, except Culbert and Forrest (2016) who found that zygomorphy reduced variance in pollinators flower entry angle. Our aim was to build on this work and observe whether floral symmetry or orientation had an effect on pollinator entry angle in a laboratory experiment using bumble bees, Bombus ignitus. Using nine different combinations of artificial flowers created from three symmetry types (radial, bilateral and disymmetrical) and three orientation types (upward, horizontal and downward), we tested the effects of these two floral aspects on the consistency of bees entry angle. Our results show that horizontal orientation significantly reduced the variance in entry angle, while symmetry had little effect. We also found no significant interactions between angle and symmetry in their effect on entry angle. Thus, our results suggest that horizontal orientation forces the bees to orient themselves relative to gravity rather than the corolla and stabilizes their flower entry. This stabilizing effect may have been mistaken for the effect of zygomorphic corolla as it is presented horizontally in most species. Consequently, we suggest that the evolution of horizontal orientation preceded that of zygomorphy as indicated by some authors, and that the reason behind the evolution of zygomorphy should be revisited.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
5
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
6
Plant Reproduction
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
8
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
9
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Planta
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
29
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%