Development and Preliminary Validation of the Group Cognitive Therapy Scale to Measure Therapist Competence
Nakashima, M.; Matsunaga, M.; Otani, M.; Kuga, H.; Fujisawa, D.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe aim of this research was to create a scale to assess the competency of therapists who conduct group cognitive behavioral therapy (G-CBT), which can serve as a tool to aid the continued training of therapists. MethodsThree stepped studies were conducted. Study 1: Through literature review and experts consensus process, essential skills for G-CBT were articulated and were categorized according to the criteria of the Cognitive Therapy Scale, a well-established rating scale to evaluate clinicians skills in individual cognitive behavioral therapy. The list of those skills was organized into a rating scale. Study 2: Behavioral anchors were added to each skill and were classified by the levels of difficulty (beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels), based on the rating by G-CBT experts. Study 3: Interrater reliability and validity of the rating scale were examined in a sample of forty-one videotaped G-CBT sessions of actual clinical sessions and educational role-plays. ResultsA twelve-item Group Cognitive Therapy Scale was developed. It consists of eleven items that have been adopted from the original Cognitive Therapy Scale, with the addition of a new item called "Intervention Using Relationships with Other Participants." This scale showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbachs alpha: 0.95), satisfactory inter-rater reliability (interclass correlation coefficients: 0.65 - 0.88), and high predictive validity. ConclusionA novel rating scale to evaluate therapists competency in G-CBT was developed and successfully validated.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychotherapies and Psychological Support for Individuals Facing Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review 96%
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Unlocking the mentally ill in Indonesia: An empirical study of the effectiveness of a “Bebas Pasung” program in Central Java 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applications of Large Language Models in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review 94%
- Development of Goal Management Training + (GMT + ) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder Through Collaborative Design: A Process Description 94%
- Attitude towards Mental Help-Seeking, Motivation, and Economic Resources in Connection with Positive, Negative, and General Psychopathological Symptoms of Schizophrenia: A Pilot Study of a Psychoeducation Program 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Treatment provision for adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study on patient and therapist experience with on-site sessions using face masks vs. telepsychiatric sessions 96%
- Current state of the evidence on community treatments for people with complex emotional needs: a scoping review 93%
- A scoping review of trauma informed approaches in acute, crisis, emergency and residential mental health care 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modified Alliance-Focused Training with Doubling as an integrative approach to improve therapists’ competencies in dealing with alliance ruptures and prevent negative outcome in psychotherapy for depression. Study protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial 96%
- A Mobile App for Prolonged Grief among Bereaved Parents: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.