Comparing supervised machine learning algorithms for the prediction of partial arterial pressure of oxygen during craniotomy
Becker-Pennrich, A. S.; Mandl, M. M.; Rieder, C.; Hoechter, D. J.; Dietz, K.; Geisler, B. P.; Boulesteix, A.-L.; Tomasi, R.; Hinske, L. C.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of continuous paO2 prediction in an intraoperative setting among neurosurgical patients with modern machine learning methods. Materials and MethodsData were extracted from routine clinical care of lung-healthy, neurosurgical patients. We used recursive feature elimination to identify relevant features for the prediction of paO2. Five machine learning algorithms (gradient boosting regressor, k-nearest neighbors regressor, random forest regressor, support vector regression, multi-layer perceptron regressor) and a multivariate linear regression were then tuned and fitted to the selected features. A performance matrix consisting of Spearmans {rho}, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) was finally computed based on the test set and used to compare and rank each algorithm. ResultsWe analyzed 4,180 patients with 12,497 observations. A total of 20 features were selected from analysis of the training dataset comprising 836 patients with 9,992 observations. The best algorithm, random forest, was able to predict paO2 values with {rho}=0.90, MAPE=10.4%, and RMSE=30.9mmHg, closely followed by gradient boosting and multi-layer perceptron. Support vector regression, k-nearest neighbors regressor and the linear regression did not achieve the performance metrics. DiscussionWe successfully applied and compared several machine learning algorithms to estimate continuous paO2 values in neurosurgical patients. The random forest regressor performed best over all three categories of the performance matrix. ConclusionPaO2 can be predicted by perioperative routine data in neurosurgical patients.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 96%
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 95%
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients 95%
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 94%
- Development of a Risk Prediction Model for Sepsis-Related Delirium Based on Multiple Machine Learning Approaches and an Online Calculator 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving irregular temporal modeling by integrating synthetic data to the electronic medical record using conditional GANs: a case study of fluid overload prediction in the intensive care unit 95%
- Machine Learning Interpretability Methods to Characterize the Importance of Hematologic Biomarkers in Prognosticating Patients with Suspected Infection 94%
- AI-MET: A Deep Learning-based Clinical Decision Support System for Distinguishing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children from Endemic Typhus 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Utility of skin tone on pulse oximetry in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study 93%
- Changes in non-linear and time-domain heart rate variability indices between critically ill COVID-19 and all-cause sepsis patients -a retrospective study 92%
- Early detection of in-patient deterioration: one prediction model does not fit all 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.