Predictive analytics that reflect disease burden: the cumulative COMET score
Monfredi, O. J.; Andris, R. T.; Lake, D. E.; Moorman, J. R. J.
Show abstract
Predictive analytics tools variably take into account data from the electronic medical record, lab tests, nursing charted vital signs and continuous cardiorespiratory monitoring data to deliver an instantaneous score that indicates patient risk or instability. Few, if any, of these tools reflect the risk to a patient accumulated over the course of an entire hospital stay. This approach fails to best utilize all of the collated data regarding the risk or instability sustained by the patient, and hence fails to fully characterize this to optimize the ability of treating clinicians to maximize the chances of a favorable outcome. We have built on our instantaneous CoMET predictive analytics score to generate the cumulative CoMET score (cCOMET), which sums all of the instantaneous CoMET scores throughout a hospital admission relative to a baseline expected risk unique to that patient. We have shown that higher cCOMET scores predict mortality, but not length of stay, and that higher baseline CoMET scores predict higher cCoMET scores at discharge/death. cCoMET scores were higher in males in our cohort, and added information to the final CoMET when it came to the prediction of death. In summary, if one is going to go to the trouble and expense of performing repeated measures when performing predictive analytics calculations, we have shown that including all of these measures in a cumulative way adds data to instantaneous predictive analytics, and could improve the ability of clinicians to predict deterioration, and improve patient outcomes in so doing.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hemodynamic profiles by non-invasive monitoring of cardiac index and vascular tone in acute heart failure patients in the emergency department: external validation and clinical outcomes 95%
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 95%
- An Online Risk Calculator for Rapid Prediction of In-hospital Mortality from COVID-19 Infection 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of digital Early Warning Score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist setting: retrospective cohort study 96%
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 95%
- Exploring Associations with Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in COVID-19 Patients upon Admission: A Model for Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in 329 Unvaccinated, Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning approaches to predict 30-day mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention in an Australian population 92%
- Vascular Comorbidities Worsen Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Hospitalized with COVID-19 92%
- Cardiac Post-acute Sequelae symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 in Community-Dwelling Adults: Cross-sectional Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- AKI Risk Score (AKI-RiSc): Developing an Interpretable Clinical Score for Early Identification of Acute Kidney Injury for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department 94%
- Rapid Clinical Screening and Staging for COVID-19 Severe Outcome A Hospitalization Study in New York City 94%
- Imputation of PaO2 from SpO2 values from the MIMIC-III Critical Care Database Using Machine-Learning Based Algorithms 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- External Validation Of A Novel Digital Signature In Continuous Cardiorespiratory Monitoring To Detect Early Respiratory Deterioration Of ICU Patients 96%
- Prospective validation of clinical deterioration predictive models prior to intensive care unit transfer among patients admitted to acute care cardiology wards 94%
- Highly comparative time series analysis of oxygen saturation and heart rate to predict respiratory outcomes in extremely preterm infants 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.