Back

Hippocampal microstructural and neurobehavioral differences in welders are related to higher R2* in the red nucleus

Lee, E.-Y.; Kim, J.; Manzieri Prado-Rico, J.; Du, G.; M. Lewis, M.; Kong, L.; D. Yanosky, J.; Kim, B.-G.; Hong, Y.-S.; B. Mailman, R.; Huang, X.

2022-06-06 toxicology
10.1101/2022.06.03.22275885 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionMetal exposure has been associated with higher risk of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimers disease (AD). We examined the potential link between welding-related metal co-exposure (e.g., Fe, Mn, Pb) and AD-related structural and neurobehavioral metrics. MethodsSubjects with (welders; n=42) or without (controls; n=31) a history of welding were examined. Metal exposure was estimated by exposure questionnaires and whole blood metal levels. Brain metal accumulations were estimated by MRI R1 (Mn) and R2* (Fe) in the caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, red nucleus (RN), and hippocampus. AD-related structural differences were assessed by volume and diffusion tensor imaging metrics in the hippocampus, and neurobehavioral aspects by learning/memory task scores. ResultsCompared to controls, welders displayed higher blood metal levels (ps <0.004) and R2* values in the caudate and RN (ps<0.024). Caudate R2* values were associated with blood Fe (p=0.043), whereas RN R2* values were correlated with blood Pb (p=0.003). Welders had higher hippocampal mean diffusivity (MD; p=0.011) and lower Story Recall scores (p=0.049), but no difference in volume or domain-wise learning/memory performance (ps>0.117). Group differences in hippocampal MD and Story Recall scores were greater with higher RN R2* values (ps<0.016). Moreover, RN R2* values reflected an indirect link between blood Pb and hippocampal MD (p=0.036) across both groups. DiscussionWelders had hippocampal structural and learning/memory performance differences similar to those in AD-at-risk populations. These AD-like differences in welders may, in part, be linked to Pb exposure reflected by higher RN R2* levels at the brain level.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.