Back

Correlation of IL-6, Coping, and Depression in Adolescent and Adult Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: A Comparative Study

kamal, s.; khowelied, A.; gomaa, m. e.; Al-Dawy, S. A.; kamel, R. m.; Ayoub, D. R.

2022-06-01 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2022.05.31.22275844 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe research has long reported that depression and stress are highly prevalent among patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis. Growing studies suggest that the inflammatory gene IL-6, in particular, contributes to the etiology of depression & stress by affecting the function of serotonin; one of the other explanations is by causing hypercortisolemia with overstimulation of the HPA axis. This study aimed to assess the inflammatory gene IL-6 in adolescent & adult patients with end-stage kidney disease receiving hemodialysis. Furthermore, to assess the coping skills of those patients upon the emergence of depressive symptoms & stress levels. MethodOne hundred and twenty-one patients receiving hemodialysis were recruited in a cross-sectional study from King Fahd Unit at Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital, Cairo University, Egypt. They were assessed for depression using Becks II depression inventory, stress by the stress perceived scale, coping by the short COPE questionnaire & they had inflammatory gene IL-6 level measured. ResultsSeventy-six patients showed depressive symptoms; adults were more depressed than adolescent patients, yet adolescents were subjected to more stress. The mean level of Interleukin-6 was 148.0{+/-}50.5pg/ml, which is higher than average. Perceived Stress Scale mean scores showed a statistically significant difference between depressed adults and adolescents (p=0.050). ConclusionsInflammatory gene IL-6 shows a higher level in depressed adolescent and adult patients receiving hemodialysis. Adult patients are more depressed than adolescent patients with end-stage kidney disease yet coping strategies are far better in depressed adolescents than adults.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
43.4%
2
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.5%
4
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
6
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
7
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
8
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
9
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
10
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
11
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
12
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
13
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
14
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
16
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
20
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
23
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
26
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%