Auditory grouping ability predicts speech-in-noise performance in cochlear implants
Choi, I.; Gander, P. E.; Berger, J. I.; Hong, J.; Colby, S.; McMurray, B.; Griffiths, T. D.
Show abstract
ObjectivesCochlear implant (CI) users exhibit a large variance in understanding speech in noise (SiN). Past works in CI users found that spectral and temporal resolutions correlate with the SiN ability, but a large portion of variance has been remaining unexplained. Our groups recent work on normal-hearing listeners showed that the ability of grouping temporally coherent tones in a complex auditory scene predicts SiN ability, highlighting a central mechanism of auditory scene analysis that contributes to SiN. The current study examined whether the auditory grouping ability contributes to SiN understanding in CI users as well. Design47 post-lingually deafened CI users performed multiple tasks including sentence-in-noise understanding, spectral ripple discrimination, temporal modulation detection, and stochastic figure-ground task in which listeners detect temporally coherent tone pips in the cloud of many tone pips that rise at random times at random frequencies. Accuracies from the latter three tasks were used as predictor variables while the sentence-in-noise performance was used as the dependent variable in a multiple linear regression analysis. ResultsNo co-linearity was found between any predictor variables. All the three predictors exhibited significant contribution in the multiple linear regression model, indicating that the ability to detect temporal coherence in a complex auditory scene explains a further amount of variance in CI users SiN performance that was not explained by spectral and temporal resolution. ConclusionsThis result indicates that the across-frequency comparison builds an important auditory cognitive mechanism in CI users SiN understanding. Clinically, this result proposes a novel paradigm to reveal a source of SiN difficulty in CI users and a potential rehabilitative strategy.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Magnified interaural level differences enhance spatial release from masking in bilateral cochlear implant users 98%
- Reducing interaural tonotopic mismatch preserves binaural unmasking in cochlear implant simulations of single-sided deafness 98%
- Representations of fricatives in sub-cortical model responses: comparisons with human consonant perception 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationship between electrophysiological measures of the electrically evoked compound action potential and cochlear implant speech perception outcomes 97%
- Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-in-Noise Test using Antiphasic Stimuli 96%
- Communication under sharply degraded auditory input and the “2-sentence” problem 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationship between auditory brainstem responses, cognitive ability, and speech-in-noise perception among young adults with normal hearing thresholds 97%
- The Audible Contrast Threshold (ACT™) test: a clinical spectro-temporal modulation detection test 97%
- From Modulated Noise to Natural Speech: the Effect of Stimulus Parameters on the Frequency Following Response 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Auditory tests for characterizing hearing deficits in listeners with various hearing abilities: The BEAR test battery 97%
- Neural correlates of masked and unmasked tones: psychoacoustics and late auditory evoked potentials (LAEPs) 96%
- Electromyographic Correlates of Effortful Listening in the Vestigial Auriculomotor System 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.