Back

Importance of AB domain in parvalbumins' calcium binding affinity

Immadisetty, K.; Jacob-Dolan, J.

2022-05-29 physiology
10.1101/2022.05.27.493786 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1Members of the parvalbumin (PV) family of calcium binding proteins are found in a variety of vertebrates, where can they influence neural functions, muscle contraction and immune responses. It was reported that the -parvalbumin (PV)s AB domain comprising two -helices, dramatically increases the proteins calcium (Ca2+) affinity by {approx}10 kcal/mol. To understand the structural basis of this effect, we conducted all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of WT PV and truncated -parvalbumin ({Delta}PV) constructs. Additionally, we also examined the binding of magnesium (Mg2+) to these isoforms, which is much weaker than Ca2+ (Mg2+ actually does not bind to the {Delta}PV). Our key finding is that reorganization energies (RE) assessed using molecular mechanics generalized Born approximation (MM/GBSA) correctly rank-order the variants according to their published Ca2+ and Mg2+ affinities. The [Formula] of the {Delta}PV compared to the wild-type (WT) is 415.57{+/-}0.55 kcal/mol, indicating that forming a holo state of {Delta}PV in the presence of Ca2+ incurs a greater reorganization penalty than the WT. This is consistent with the {Delta}PV exhibiting lesser Ca2+ affinity than the WT ({approx}9.5 kcal/mol). Similar trend was observed for Mg2+ bound variants as well. Further, we screened for metrics such as oxygen coordination of EF hand residues with ions and found that the total oxygen coordination number (16 vs. 12 in WT:Ca2+ and {Delta}PV:Ca2+) correlate with the reported ion affinities (-22 vs. -12.6 kcal/mol in WT:Ca2+ and {Delta}PV:Ca2+), which indicates that AB domain is required for the protein to coordinate with maximal efficiency with the binding ions. To our surprise, no significant differences were observed between the Mg2+ bound WT and {Delta}PV isoforms. Additionally, we have screened for factors such as total number of waters, hydrogen bonds, protein helicity and {beta}-content for the entire protein, which enables us to understand the impact of lack of AB domain on the entire structure and not just binding sites. Our data indicate that AB improves the overall helicity ({approx}5%) in apo as well as holo forms. Particularly, AB increases -helicity in the D-helix residues (i.e., 60-65) upon ion binding by {approx}35% (90% vs. 55% in the Ca2+ bound WT and {Delta}PV, 60% vs. 20% in the Mg2+ bound WT and {Delta}PV), which likely contributes to high Ca2+ binding affinity. On the contrary, no significant effect on the overall {beta}-content was observed. Similarly, increased dehydration ({approx}50) and increase in total number of hydrogen bonds ({approx}7) were observed upon ion binding in both the WT and {Delta}PV systems, however, no significant differences were observed between the WT and {Delta}PV variants and also between Ca2+ and Mg2+ isoforms. We speculate that this is due to the partially folded apo state that was captured in our MD simulations, which might not be physiologically relevant as suggested by NMR experiments [1]. Also, we have identified seven different interactions that might play a key role in binding the AB domain with the CDEF helices, particularly the D22(AB)-S78(CDEF) hydrogen bond. Overall, this study indicates that local (i.e., the EF hands) as well as global factors play a role in improved ion binding due to AB domain.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
2
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.1%
4
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
6
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
8
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
9
Biochimie
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
10
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
11
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
12
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
13
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
23
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Journal of General Physiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Biophysics and Physicobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%