An Empirical Bayes Method for Differential Expression Analysis of Single Cells with Deep Generative Models
Boyeau, P.; Regier, J.; Gayoso, A.; Jordan, M. I.; Lopez, R.; Yosef, N.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWDetecting differentially expressed genes is important for characterizing subpopulations of cells. In scRNA-seq data, however, nuisance variation due to technical factors like sequencing depth and RNA capture efficiency obscures the underlying biological signal. Deep generative models have been extensively applied to scRNA-seq data, with a special focus on embedding cells into a low-dimensional latent space and correcting for batch effects. However, little attention has been given to the problem of utilizing the uncertainty from the deep generative model for differential expression. Furthermore, the existing approaches do not allow controlling for the effect size or the false discovery rate. Here, we present lvm-DE, a generic Bayesian approach for performing differential expression from using a fitted deep generative model, while controlling the false discovery rate. We apply the lvm-DE framework to scVI and scSphere, two deep generative models. The resulting approaches outperform the state-of-the-art methods at estimating the log fold change in gene expression levels, as well as detecting differentially expressed genes between subpopulations of cells.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Harp: Platform Independent Deconvolution Tool 97%
- ARTEMIS integrates autoencoders and schrodinger bridges to predict continuous dynamics of gene expression, cell population and perturbation from time-series single-cell data 96%
- Identifying cancer pathway dysregulations using differential causal effects 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating discrepancies in dimensionality reduction for time-series single-cell RNA-sequencing data 96%
- scValue: value-based subsampling of large-scale single-cell transcriptomic data for machine and deep learning tasks 96%
- A comprehensive comparison on cell type composition inference for spatial transcriptomics data 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.