Cortico-striatal engagement during cue-reactivity, reappraisal, and savoring of drug and non-drug stimuli predicts craving in heroin addiction
Huang, Y.; Ceceli, A. O.; Kronberg, G.; King, S.; Malaker, P.; Alia-Klein, N.; Garland, E.; Goldstein, R. Z.
Show abstract
ImportanceHeroin addiction is rampant and persistent, with devastating consequences to the public health, necessitating further study into the neurobiological mechanisms of drug cue-reactivity and craving-reducing interventions (e.g., reappraisal and savoring). ObjectiveTo document cortico-striatal reactivity during passive viewing, reappraisal, and savoring, as predictors of heroin craving in individuals with heroin use disorder (iHUD) vs. controls. DesignA cross-sectional study (11/2020-09/2021), with a novel fMRI task in iHUD vs. controls. SettingiHUD and controls were recruited from treatment facilities and surrounding neighborhoods, respectively. ParticipantsiHUD (N=32) [40.3{+/-}8.8 years; 7 (21.9%) women] and age-/sex-matched controls (N=21) [40.6{+/-}10.8 years; 8 (38%) women]. Main Outcomes and MeasuresBetween-group blood-oxygen-level-dependent signal differences during cue-reactivity/reappraisal/savoring and their direct contrast (reappraisal vs. savoring), and correlations with drug craving in iHUD. ResultsDrug cue-reactivity (look drug>neutral) revealed higher nucleus accumbens and ventromedial prefrontal cortical activity in iHUD vs. controls (Z>3.1, p<.05), the latter positively correlated with post-task drug cravings (r2=.47, p<.001). In contrast, controls showed higher dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) reactivity to food cues (>drug; Z>3.1, p<.05; with the opposite pattern for the iHUD). Both drug-reappraisal and food-savoring (vs. respective passive viewing) showed increased activity in the IFG and supplementary motor area in all participants; the higher the dlPFC/IFG drug reappraisal in iHUD, the lower the post-MRI drug cue-induced craving (Z>3.1, p<.05). A direct comparison (drug-reappraisal vs. food-savoring) revealed higher drug-reappraisal in the ventral caudate and PFC regions in the iHUD (Z>3.1, p<.05), as predicted in the striatum by pre-task drug cravings (Z>2.57, p<.05); in controls, these areas showed instead higher food-savoring (Z>3.1, p<.05). Conclusions and RelevanceWe demonstrate upregulated cortico-striatal activity during drug-cue exposure (while passively looking or reappraising) and impaired reactivity during processing (looking or savoring) of non-drug rewards in heroin addiction. These results bolster the impaired response inhibition and salience attribution model of drug addiction, previously supported mostly by results in stimulant addiction. Normalizing cortico-striatal function by reducing drug cue-reactivity (e.g., reappraising drug cues) and enhancing natural reward valuation (e.g., savoring food stimuli) may inform therapeutic mechanisms for reducing drug craving/seeking in heroin addiction. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat are the cortico-striatal brain regions driving reactivity to and reappraisal of drug vs. savoring food cues in individuals with heroin use disorder (iHUD); do these activations contribute to self-reported drug cravings? FindingsIn this cross-sectional study, and compared to matched healthy control subjects, iHUD exhibited cortico-striatal reward and self-control regional hyperactivations to drug cues during both passive viewing of pictures and their reappraisal as compared to savoring of alternative reward (images of food); and these activations correlated with drug cravings. MeaningWe identified drug-cue biased processing in cortico-striatal regions in iHUD, providing potential therapeutic biomarkers for neuromodulation and cognitive training in reducing hyper-responsiveness to drug cues and enhancing responses to alternative natural rewards.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Nicotine dependence (trait) and acute nicotinic stimulation (state) modulate attention but not cognitive control: converging fMRI evidence from Go-Nogo and Flanker tasks 95%
- Effects of Diazepam on Hippocampal Blood Flow in People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis 94%
- Neuroimaging correlates and predictors of response to repeated-dose intravenous ketamine in PTSD 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating resting brain perfusion abnormalities and target-engagement by intranasal oxytocin in women with bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder and healthy controls 94%
- Meta-analysis of Reward Processing in Major Depressive Disorder Reveals Distinct Abnormalities within the Reward Circuit 94%
- Extracellular Matrix Abnormalities in the Hippocampus of Subjects with Substance Use Disorder 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning identifies large-scale reward-related activity modulated by dopaminergic enhancement in major depression 94%
- Clinical and functional connectivity outcomes of 5-Hz repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation as an add-on treatment in cocaine use disorder: a double-blind randomized controlled trial 94%
- Maladaptive avoidance learning in the orbitofrontal cortex in adolescents with major depression 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduced responsiveness of the reward system underlies tolerance to cannabis impairment in chronic users 95%
- Disrupted functional connectivity of the brain reward system in substance use problems: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies 94%
- Common and separable neurofunctional dysregulations characterize obsessive compulsive, substance use, and gaming disorders - evidence from an activation likelihood meta-analysis of functional imaging studies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cue-Induced Craving and Negative Emotion Disrupt Response Inhibition in Methamphetamine Use Disorder: Behavioral and fMRI Results from a Mixed Go/No-Go Task 96%
- Brain Network Segregation is Associated with Drug Use Severity in Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder 94%
- Common and distinct brain activity associated with risky and ambiguous decision-making 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.