Back

Camera-based monitoring of Bogong moths in Alpine Australia reveals drivers of migratory behaviour

Wallace, J. R. A.; Reber, T.; Khaldy, L.; Mathews-Hunter, B.; Green, K.; Dreyer, D.; Warrant, E. J.

2022-05-19 ecology
10.1101/2022.05.19.492631 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Bogong moth Agrotis infusa is well known for its remarkable annual round-trip migration from its breeding grounds across eastern Australia to its aestivation sites in the Australian Alps, to which it provides an important annual influx of nutrients. Over recent years, we have benefited from a growing understanding of the navigational abilities of the Bogong moth. Meanwhile, the population of Bogong moths has been shrinking. Recently, the ecologically and culturally important Bogong moth was listed as endangered by the IUCN Red List, and the establishment of a program for long-term monitoring of its population has been identified as critical for its conservation. Here, we present the results of two years of monitoring of the Bogong moth population in the Australian Alps using a recently developed method for automated monitoring of flying insects, named Camfi. We found that the evening flights of Bogong moths occur throughout summer, and are modulated by daily weather factors. We present a simple heuristic model of the arrival to and departure from aestivation sites by Bogong moths, and confirm results obtained from fox-scat surveys which found that aestivating Bogong moths occupy higher elevations as the summer progresses. We also present the first recorded observations of the impact of bushfire smoke on aestivating Bogong moths. We observed a dramatic reduction in the size of a cluster of aestivating Bogong moths during the fire, and evidence of a large departure from the fire-affected area the day after the fire. Our results highlight the challenges of monitoring Bogong moths in the wild, and support the continued use of automated camera-based methods for that purpose.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.