Can machine learning with data from wearable devices distinguish disease severity levels and generalise across patients? A pilot study in Mania and Depression
Li, B. M.; Corponi, F.; Anmella, G.; Mas, A.; Sanabra, M.; Pacchiarotti, I.; Valenti, M.; Gimenez-Palomo, A.; Garriga, M.; Agasi, I.; Bastidas, A.; Fernandez-Plaza, T.; Arbelo, N.; Cavero, M.; Garcia-Rizo, C.; Bioque, M.; Verdolini, N.; Madero, S.; Murru, A.; Grande, I.; Amoretti, S.; Ruiz, V.; Fico, G.; De Prisco, M.; Oliva, V.; Vieta, E.; Hidalgo-Mazzei, D.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWMood disorders are severe and chronic mental conditions exacting high costs from society. The lack of reliable biomarkers to aid clinicians in tailoring pharmacotherapy based on distinguishable patient-specific traits means that the current prescribing paradigm is largely one of trial and error. Previous studies showed that different biological signatures, such as patterns of heart rate variability or electro-dermal reactivity, are associated with clinically meaningful outcomes. Against this backdrop, the advances in machine learning and the spread of wearable devices capable of providing continuous and ecological monitoring of patients may unlock great opportunities in mental healthcare. We herewith present a pilot study on mania and depression where we moved beyond the simple disease state binary classification but pursued the more informative and clinically meaningful task of differentiating between levels of disease severity. While most previous similar endeavours used recording segments extracted from the same subjects for both training and testing, we explicitly carried out model development and evaluation on segments from different groups of patients, in order to have a fair assessment of the model out-of-sample generalisation. This illustrated how individuals heterogeneity and non-disease-related dimensions of variations (e.g. sex, age, physical fitness) may dominate the signal so that in low sample size regimes a model might learn and overfit subject-specific patterns rather than capturing disease-relevant traits generalisable across disorders. Lastly, we developed a viable baseline for pre-processing raw data from wristband recordings and compared three classical and two deep-learning models to identify levels of disease severity.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of medical device software for the screening and assessment of depression severity using data collected from a wristband-type wearable device: SWIFT study protocol 94%
- Causality analysis in major depressive disorder for early prediction of treatment outcomes with pharmacological and neuromodulation therapies 94%
- Bridging Structural MRI with Cognitive Function for Individual Level Classification of Early Psychosis via Deep Learning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote digital measurement of visual and auditory markers of Major Depressive Disorder severity and treatment response. 92%
- Listening to mental health crisis needs at scale: using Natural Language Processing to understand and evaluate a mental health crisis text messaging service 91%
- CharMark: A Markov Approach to Linguistic Biomarkers in Dementia 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Practical Strategies for Extreme Missing Data Imputation in Dementia Diagnosis 92%
- Hyperbolic graph embedding of MEG brain networks to study brain alterations in individuals with subjective cognitive decline 92%
- A Habenula Neural Biomarker Simultaneously Tracks Weekly and Daily Symptom Variations during Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy for Depression 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rett syndrome severity estimation with the BioStamp nPoint using interactions between heart rate variability and body movement 96%
- Discrimination of sleep and wake periods from a hip-worn raw acceleration sensor using recurrent neural networks 94%
- Applying machine learning in motor activity time series of depressed bipolar and unipolar patients. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.