Back

Using NAMs to characterize chemical bioactivity at the transcriptomic, proteomic and phosphoproteomic levels

Li, Y.; zhang, Z.; Jiang, S.; Xu, F.; Tulum, L.; Li, K.; Liu, S.; Li, S.; Chang, L.; Liddell, M.; Tu, F.; Gu, X.; Carmichael, P. L.; White, A.; Peng, S.; Zhang, Q.; Li, J.; Zuo, T.; Kukic, P.; Xu, P.

2022-05-19 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2022.05.18.492410 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Omic-based technologies are of particular interest and importance for non-animal chemical hazard and risk characterization based on the premise that any apical endpoint change must be underpinned by some alterations measured at the omic levels. In this work we studied cellular responses to caffeine and coumarin by generating and integrating multi-omic data from transcriptomic, proteomic and phosphoproteomic experiments. We have shown that the methodology presented here is able to capture the complete chain of events from the first compound-induced changes at the phosphoproteome level to changes in gene expression induced by transcription factors and lastly to changes in protein abundance that further influence changes at the cellular level. In HepG2 cells we found the metabolism of lipids and general cellular stress to be dominant biological processes in response to caffeine and coumarin exposure, respectively. The phosphoproteomic changes were detected early in time, at very low concentrations and provided a fast adaptive cellular response to chemical exposure. Changes in protein abundance were found much less frequently than the transcriptomic changes and can be used, together with the transcriptomic changes, to facilitate a more complete understanding of pathway responses to chemical exposure. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=169 SRC="FIGDIR/small/492410v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (48K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e348c8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bf50c5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4fea36org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@998cb8_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.9%
2
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.7%
3
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
5
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
7
NeuroToxicology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
10
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
12
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
16
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
17
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
18
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
20
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
21
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
22
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%