Back

Machine Learning Reveals The Effect of Maternal Age on The Mouse Pre-Implantation Embryo Developmental Timing

Daniel, N.; Wasserman, T.; Adler, Z.; Czyzewski, T.; Savir, Y.

2022-05-18 systems biology
10.1101/2022.05.17.492244 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In recent years, many women have delayed childbearing, thus increasing the necessity for assisted reproductive technology (ART) for older women1-3. Despite advances in ART4, its success rate in advanced-age women is still very low3,4. As time-lapse imaging became available, morphological features of the developing pre-implantation embryo, in-vitro, are heavily used to assess its potency5-9. Timing of embryo cleavage is also an important factor that correlates with blastocyst formation and pregnancy rates8,10-14. Yet, our understanding of the interplay between embryos morphology, viability, and maternal age is limited, as manual approaches to infer embryo morphokinetics are time-consuming, subjective, and prone to errors. Machine learning15-18 was recently harnessed to predict embryo developmental potential19,20, however, with limited success. Here, we develop an artificial intelligence (AI) platform that infers the embryos developmental stage and captures tens of morphological properties and developmental dynamics. We show that developmental timing is the most informative and predictive morphokinetic property, particularly for embryos from maternally aged females. Analyzing the timing distributions reveals that viable embryos are confined into an age-independent temporal corridor while non-viable embryos deviate from it towards slower transition times. Yet, the deviation of non-viable embryos from the temporal corridor is age-dependent. Furthermore, there is a significant correlation between consecutive developmental stages transition times that diminishes in maternally old embryos. Overall, our results suggest that maternally old embryos most apparent morphokinetic property is the loss of temporal regulation. Our results and platform pave the way for a more accurate, maternally-age-dependent, assisted reproductive technology.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.3%
4
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
5
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
7
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
9
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
10
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
11
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
12
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
13
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
14
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
15
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
18
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
21
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Cell Proliferation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%