Improving the health of people experiencing homelessness with recent drug overdose: rationale for and design of the Pharmacist and Homeless Outreach worker Engagement Non-medical Independent prescribing Rx (PHOENIx) pilot randomised controlled trial
Lowrie, R.; McPherson, A.; Mair, F. S.; Maguire, D.; Paudyal, V.; Blair, B.; Brannan, D.; Moir, J.; Hughes, F.; Duncan, C.; Stock, K.; Farmer, N.; Ramage, B.; Lombard, C.; Ross, S.; Scott, A.; Provan, G.; Sills, L.; Hislop, J.; Williamson, A.
Show abstract
IntroductionNumbers of People Experiencing Homelessness (PEH) are increasing worldwide. Systematic reviews show high levels of multimorbidity and mortality due to treatable diseases including drug overdose. Integrated health and social care outreach interventions may improve outcomes. No previous studies have targeted PEH with recent drug overdose despite their high recorded levels of drug related deaths. There are few data on health and social care problems. Feasibility work suggests a collaborative health and social care intervention (Pharmacist and Homeless Outreach Engagement Non-medical Independent prescriber Rx-PHOENIx) is potentially beneficial. We describe the methods of a pilot randomised controlled trial(RCT) with parallel process and economic evaluation in PEH with at least one drug-related overdose in the preceding 6 months. MethodsDetailed health and social care information will be collected at baseline before 1:1 randomisation to: care-as-usual plus visits from a pharmacist and homeless outreach worker (PHOENIx) for 6-9 months; or care-as-usual. The main outcomes are rate of presentations to emergency department(ED) for overdose or other causes and whether to progress to a definitive RCT based on: recruitment of [≥] 100 participants within 4 months;[≥] 60% patients remaining in the study at 6 and 9 months follow up;[≥] 60% of patients in the PHOENIx group receiving the intervention; and[≥] 80% of patients with data collected. Secondary outcomes include: hospitalisations; treatment uptake and patient reported measures. Semi-structured interviews will explore future implementation of PHOENIx, and reasons for overdose and protective factors. An economic evaluation will assess the feasibility of conducting a cost effectiveness analysis in a subsequent definitive trial. DiscussionThe study will determine whether to proceed to a definitive RCT for PEH aiming to fulfil unmet health and social care needs of those experiencing homelessness and at risk of drug related harms and deaths while providing useful insights into barriers and facilitators to PHOENIx and characterising the health and social care needs of PEH. Ethics and disseminationThe trial was approved by the South East Scotland National Health Service Research Ethics Committee 01. Results will be available in the last quarter of 2022. Registration detailsThe trial is registered with the UK Clinical Trials Registry (ISRCTN 10585019). Strengths and limitations of the study- We plan to recruit patients normally excluded from intervention trials and collect a diverse health and social care dataset at baseline - The 6-9 month individualised, complex intervention offers longer consultations, integrated continuous, health and social care support on outreach - Mixed methods will enable determination of whether a subsequent trial is merited from an efficacy, economic and patient perspective. - By design, the pilot randomised controlled trial lacks the power to detect a clinically significant effect and recruitment was limited to 20 locations in Scotlands largest city
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- NHS CHECK: protocol for a cohort study investigating the psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers 95%
- The United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of healthcare and ancillary workers in UK healthcare settings 94%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Shared decision-making interventions in the choice of antipsychotic prescription in people living with psychosis (SHAPE): protocol for a realist review 94%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
- STIMULATE-ICP-CAREINEQUAL - Defining usual care and examining inequalities in Long Covid support: protocol for a mixed-methods study (part of STIMULATE-ICP: Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals combining technological and behavioural components: protocol for a feasibility trial 93%
- Feasibility and acceptability of Narrative Exposure Therapy to treat individuals with PTSD who are homeless or vulnerably housed: A pilot randomized controlled trial 92%
- A Health Navigator intervention to address the unmet social needs of caregivers of hospitalised children in South Australia: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 92%
- Patient characteristics associated with clinically coded long COVID: an OpenSAFELY study using electronic health records 91%
- Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antipsychotic management in general practice: serial cross-sectional study (2011-2020) 92%
- Colchicine for COVID-19 in adults in the community (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial 91%
- Targeted encouragement of GP consultations for possible cancer symptoms: randomised controlled trial 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.