Back

Effects of social support on depression risk during the COVID-19 pandemic: What support types and for whom?

Choi, K. W.; Lee, Y. H.; Liu, Z.; Fatori, D.; Bauermeister, J. R.; Luh, R. A.; Clark, C. R.; Brunoni, A. R.; Bauermeister, S.; Smoller, J. W.

2022-05-16 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2022.05.15.22274976 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRates of depression have increased worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic. One known protective factor for depression is social support, but more work is needed to quantify the extent to which social support could reduce depression risk during a global crisis, and specifically to identify which types of support are most helpful, and who might benefit most. MethodsData were obtained from participants in the All of Us Research Program who responded to the COVID-19 Participant Experience (COPE) survey administered monthly from May 2020 to July 2020 (N=69,066, 66% female). Social support was assessed using 10 items measuring emotional/informational support (e.g., someone to confide in or talk to about yourself or your problems), positive social interaction support (e.g., someone to do things with to help you get your mind off things), and tangible support (e.g., someone to help with daily chores if sick). Elevated depression symptoms were defined based on having a moderate-to-severe ([≥]10) score on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to test associations across time between overall social support and its subtypes with depression, adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors. We then assessed interactions between social support and potential effect modifiers: age, sex, pre-pandemic mood disorder, and pandemic-related stressors (e.g., financial insecurity). ResultsApproximately 16% of the sample experienced elevated depressive symptoms. Overall social support was associated with significantly reduced odds of depression (adjusted odds ratio, aOR [95% CI]=0.44 [0.42-0.45]). Among subtypes, emotional/informational support (aOR=0.42 [0.41-0.43]) and positive social interactions (aOR=0.43 [0.41-0.44]) showed the largest protective associations with depression, followed by tangible support (aOR=0.63 [0.61-0.65]). Sex, age, and pandemic-related financial stressors were statistically significant modifiers of the association between social support and depression. ConclusionsIndividuals reporting higher levels of social support were at reduced risk of depression during the early COVID-19 pandemic. The perceived availability of emotional support and positive social interactions, more so than tangible support, was key. Individuals more vulnerable to depression (e.g., women, younger individuals, and those experiencing financial stressors) may particularly benefit from enhanced social support, supporting a precision prevention approach.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.9%
2
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
5
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.3%
7
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
11
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
13
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
18
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
21
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
27
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
28
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%