Effects of social support on depression risk during the COVID-19 pandemic: What support types and for whom?
Choi, K. W.; Lee, Y. H.; Liu, Z.; Fatori, D.; Bauermeister, J. R.; Luh, R. A.; Clark, C. R.; Brunoni, A. R.; Bauermeister, S.; Smoller, J. W.
Show abstract
BackgroundRates of depression have increased worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic. One known protective factor for depression is social support, but more work is needed to quantify the extent to which social support could reduce depression risk during a global crisis, and specifically to identify which types of support are most helpful, and who might benefit most. MethodsData were obtained from participants in the All of Us Research Program who responded to the COVID-19 Participant Experience (COPE) survey administered monthly from May 2020 to July 2020 (N=69,066, 66% female). Social support was assessed using 10 items measuring emotional/informational support (e.g., someone to confide in or talk to about yourself or your problems), positive social interaction support (e.g., someone to do things with to help you get your mind off things), and tangible support (e.g., someone to help with daily chores if sick). Elevated depression symptoms were defined based on having a moderate-to-severe ([≥]10) score on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to test associations across time between overall social support and its subtypes with depression, adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors. We then assessed interactions between social support and potential effect modifiers: age, sex, pre-pandemic mood disorder, and pandemic-related stressors (e.g., financial insecurity). ResultsApproximately 16% of the sample experienced elevated depressive symptoms. Overall social support was associated with significantly reduced odds of depression (adjusted odds ratio, aOR [95% CI]=0.44 [0.42-0.45]). Among subtypes, emotional/informational support (aOR=0.42 [0.41-0.43]) and positive social interactions (aOR=0.43 [0.41-0.44]) showed the largest protective associations with depression, followed by tangible support (aOR=0.63 [0.61-0.65]). Sex, age, and pandemic-related financial stressors were statistically significant modifiers of the association between social support and depression. ConclusionsIndividuals reporting higher levels of social support were at reduced risk of depression during the early COVID-19 pandemic. The perceived availability of emotional support and positive social interactions, more so than tangible support, was key. Individuals more vulnerable to depression (e.g., women, younger individuals, and those experiencing financial stressors) may particularly benefit from enhanced social support, supporting a precision prevention approach.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Context Matters! Depression following childbirth or a chronic disease diagnosis shows specific risk factor profiles 95%
- Multiple measures of depression to enhance validity of Major Depressive Disorder in the UK Biobank 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Great Expectations: A Critical Review of and Recommendations for the study of Reward Processing as a Cause and Predictor of Depression 94%
- Delineating the Genetic Component of Gene Expression in Major Depression 92%
- Descriptives and genetic correlates of eating disorder diagnostic transitions and presumed remission in the Danish registry 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emotional Adaptation During A Crisis: Decline in Anxiety and Depression After the Initial Weeks of COVID-19 in the United States 96%
- Role of Inflammation in Depressive and Anxiety Disorders, Affect, and Cognition: Genetic and Non-Genetic Findings in the Lifelines Cohort Study 94%
- A Selective Increase in OC Symptoms is Driving Information Seeking and Guideline Adherence During the Covid-19 Pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunometabolic Blood Biomarkers of Developmental Trajectories of Depressive Symptoms: Findings From the ALSPAC Birth Cohort 94%
- What’s in a diagnosis? A genetic decomposition of major depression 93%
- Correlates of suicidal behaviors and genetic risk among United States veterans with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.