Post-acute health care burden after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A retrospective cohort study among 530,892 adults
McNaughton, C. D.; Augstin, P. C.; Sivaswamy, A.; Fang, J.; Abdel-Qadir, H.; Daneman, N.; Udell, J. A.; Wodchis, W.; Mostarac, I.; Atzema, C. L.
Show abstract
ImportanceThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic portends a significant increase in health care use related to post-acute COVID sequelae, but the magnitude is not known. ObjectiveTo assess the burden of post-acute health care use after a positive versus negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsRetrospective cohort study of community-dwelling adults January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021 in Ontario, Canada, using linked population-based health data. Follow-up began 56 days after PCR testing. ExposuresIndividuals with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test were matched 1:1 to individuals who tested negative based on hospitalization, test date, public health unit, sex, and a propensity score of socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe health care utilization rate was the number of outpatient clinical encounters, homecare encounters, emergency department visits, days hospitalized, and days in long-term care per person-year. Mean health care utilization for test-positive versus negative individuals was compared using negative binomial regression, and rates at 95th and 99th percentiles were compared. Outcomes were also stratified by sex. ResultsAmong 530,232 unique, matched individuals, mean age was 44 years (sd 17), 51% were female, and 0.6% had received [≥]1 COVID-19 vaccine dose. The mean rate of health care utilization was 11% higher in test-positive individuals (RR 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.13). At the 95th percentile, test-positive individuals had 2.1 (95% CI 1.5-2.6) more health care encounters per person-year, and at the 99th percentile 71.9 (95% CI 57.6-83.2) more health care encounters per person-year. At the 95th percentile, test-positive women had 3.8 (95% CI 2.8-4.8) more health care encounters per person-year while there was no difference for men. At the 99th percentile, test-positive women had 76.7 (95% CI 56.3-89.6) more encounters per person-year, compared to 37.6 (95% CI 16.7-64.3) per person-year for men. Conclusions and RelevancePost-acute health care utilization after a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test is significantly higher compared to matched test-negative individuals. Given the number of infections worldwide, this translates to a tremendous increase in use of health care resources. Stakeholders can use these findings to prepare for health care demand associated with long COVID. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSHow does the burden of health care use [≥]56 days after a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test compare to matched individuals who tested negative? FindingsAfter accounting for multiple factors, the mean burden of post-acute health care use was 11% higher among those who tested positive, with higher rates of outpatient encounters, days hospitalized, and days in long-term care. Rates of homecare use were higher for test-positive women but lower for men. For perspective, for every day in January 2022 with 100,000 or more infections, this translates to an estimated 72,000 additional post-acute health care encounters per year for the 1% of people who experienced the most severe complications of SARS-CoV-2; among those in the top 50% of health care use, this translates to 245,000 additional health care encounters per year. This increase will occur in the context of an ongoing pandemic and, in many health care systems, a depleted workforce and backlogs of care. Unless addressed, this increase is likely to exacerbate existing health inequities. MeaningGiven the large number of people infected, stakeholders can use these findings to plan for health care use associated with long COVID.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of the “Muslim Ban” Executive Order on Healthcare Utilization in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota 94%
- Clinical Outcomes, Costs, and Cost-effectiveness of Strategies for People Experiencing Sheltered Homelessness During the COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- Out-of-Pocket Spending for COVID-19 Hospitalizations in 2020 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiology of post-COVID syndrome following hospitalisation with coronavirus: a retrospective cohort study 92%
- Risk Of Hospitalisation With COVID-19 Among Teachers Compared To Healthcare Workers And Other Working-Age Adults. A Nationwide Case-Control Study 91%
- Effectiveness of a Fourth Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine among Long-Term Care Residents in Ontario, Canada 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social inequalities in COVID-19 deaths by area-level income: patterns over time and the mediating role of vaccination in a population of 11.2 million people in Ontario, Canada 92%
- The US Midlife Mortality Crisis Continues: Excess Cause-Specific Mortality During 2020 92%
- Depression at the intersection of race/ethnicity, sex/gender, and sexual orientation in a nationally representative sample of US adults: A design-weighted MAIHDA 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for severe COVID-19 in hospitalized children in Canada: A national prospective study from March 2020–May 2021 92%
- Vaccination reduces need for emergency care in breakthrough COVID-19 infections: A multicenter cohort study 92%
- Effectiveness of CoronaVac in the setting of high SARS-CoV-2 P.1 variant transmission in Brazil: A test-negative case-control study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.