PixelPrint: Three-dimensional printing of realistic patient-specific lung phantoms for validation of computed tomography post-processing and inference algorithms
Shapira, N.; Donovan, K.; Mei, K.; Geagan, M.; Roshkovan, L.; Gang, G.; Abed, M.; Linna, N. B.; Cranston, C. P.; Leary, C. N.; Dhanaliwala, A. H.; Kontos, D.; Litt, H. I.; Stayman, J. W.; Shinohara, R. T.; Noël, P. B.
Show abstract
BackgroundRadiomics and other modern clinical decision-support algorithms are emerging as the next frontier for diagnostic and prognostic medical imaging. However, heterogeneities in image characteristics due to variations in imaging systems and protocols hamper the advancement of reproducible feature extraction pipelines. There is a growing need for realistic patient-based phantoms that accurately mimic human anatomy and disease manifestations to provide consistent ground-truth targets when comparing different feature extraction or image cohort normalization techniques. Materials and MethodsPixelPrint was developed for 3D-printing lifelike lung phantoms for computed tomography (CT) by directly translating clinical images into printer instructions that control the density on a voxel-by-voxel basis. CT datasets of three COVID-19 pneumonia patients served as input for 3D-printing lung phantoms. Five radiologists rated patient and phantom images for imaging characteristics and diagnostic confidence in a blinded reader study. Linear mixed models were utilized to evaluate effect sizes of evaluating phantom as opposed to patient images. Finally, PixelPrints reproducibility was evaluated by producing four phantoms from the same clinical images. ResultsEstimated mean differences between patient and phantom images were small (0.03-0.29, using a 1-5 scale). Effect size assessment with respect to rating variabilities revealed that the effect of having a phantom in the image is within one-third of the inter- and intra-reader variabilities. PixelPrints production reproducibility tests showed high correspondence among four phantoms produced using the same patient images, with higher similarity scores between high-dose scans of the different phantoms than those measured between clinical-dose scans of a single phantom. ConclusionsWe demonstrated PixelPrints ability to produce lifelike 3D-printed CT lung phantoms reliably. These can provide ground-truth targets for validating the generalizability of inference-based decision-support algorithms between different health centers and imaging protocols, as well as for optimizing scan protocols with realistic patient-based phantoms.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 94%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 94%
- PSMA-Hornet: fully-automated, multi-target segmentation of healthy organs in PSMA PET/CT images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inconsistency of AI in Intracranial Aneurysm Detection with Varying Dose and Image Reconstruction 95%
- Identifying relationships between imaging phenotypes and lung cancer-related mutation status: EGFR and KRAS 94%
- High-Dimensional Multinomial Multiclass Severity Scoring of COVID-19 Pneumonia Using CT Radiomics Features and Machine Learning Algorithms 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient-derived PixelPrint phantoms for evaluating clinical imaging performance of a deep learning CT reconstruction algorithm 98%
- Reproducible spectral CT thermometry with liver-mimicking phantoms for image-guided thermal ablation 96%
- Deep learning-based auto-segmentation of swallowing and chewing structures 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- First-generation clinical dual-source photon-counting CT: ultra-low dose quantitative spectral imaging 97%
- Impact of Non-Contrast Enhanced Imaging Input Sequences on the Generation of Virtual Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI Scans using Neural Networks 92%
- From Community Acquired Pneumonia to COVID-19: A Deep Learning Based Method for Quantitative Analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT Scans 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Coronary artery calcium mass measurement based on integrated intensity and volume fraction techniques 96%
- “E Pluribus Unum”: Prospective acceptability benchmarking from the Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology (C3RO) Crowdsourced Initiative for Multi-Observer Segmentation 94%
- Fiberscopic Pattern Removal for Optimal Coverage in 3D Bladder Reconstructions of Fiberscope Cystoscopy Videos 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.