Medical journeys of victims of exploitation and trafficking: a retrospective cohort study using a large multi-state dataset and new ICD-10 codes
Yagci Sokat, K.; Gutfraind, A.; Muscioni, G.; Alahmadi, S.; Hudlow, J.; Hershow, R. C.; Norgeot, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundTrafficking and exploitation for sex or labor affects millions of persons worldwide. To improve healthcare for these patients, in late 2018 new ICD-10 medical diagnosis codes were implemented in the US. MethodsHere we report on a database search of a large US health insurer that contained approximately 47.1 million patients and 0.9 million provider organizations, not limited to large medical systems. We reported on any diagnosis with the new codes between 2018-09-01 and 2022-09-01. ResultsThe dataset was found to contain 5,262 instances of the ICD-10 codes. Regression analysis of the codes found a 5.8% increase in the uptake of these codes per year, representing a decline relative to 6.7% annual increase in the data. The codes were used by 1,810 different providers (0.19% of total) for 2,793 patients. Of the patients, 1,248 were recently trafficked, while the remainder had a personal history of exploitation. Of the recent cases, 86% experienced sexual exploitation, 14% labor exploitation and 0.8% both types. These patients were predominantly female (83%) with a median age of 20 (interquartile range: 15-35). The patients were characterized by persistently high prevalence of mental health conditions (including anxiety - 21%, post-traumatic stress disorder - 20%, major depression - 18%), sexually-transmitted infections, and high utilization of the emergency department (ED). The first report of trafficking occurred most often outside of a hospital or emergency setting (55%), primarily during primary care and psychiatric visits. ConclusionsOur study strengthens the case for expanding the use of the new ICD-10 codes and studying the barriers to their implementation.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Violence, firearms, and the coronavirus pandemic: Findings from the 2020 California Safety and Wellbeing Survey 92%
- Electronic Health Record Documentation of Psychiatric Assessments in Massachusetts Emergency Department and Outpatient Settings During the COVID-19 Pandemic 90%
- The Impact of the “Muslim Ban” Executive Order on Healthcare Utilization in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dual pandemic of firearm injury and COVID-19 in Central and Southeastern Ohio: An interrupted time series analysis 93%
- EMS injury cause codes more accurate than emergency department visit ICD-10-CM codes for firearm injury intent in North Carolina 92%
- Mass Homicide by Firearm in Canada: Effects of Legislation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Common Factors in Serious Case Reviews of Child Maltreatment where there is a Medical Cause of Death: Qualitative Thematic Analysis 91%
- Improving our understanding of the social determinants of mental health: A data linkage study of mental health records and the 2011 UK census 90%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among residents of Northern California jails 88%
- Characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccination status among staff and faculty of a large, diverse University in Los Angeles 87%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy January-March 2021 among 18-64 year old US adults by employment and occupation 87%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.