Back

Different Routes for Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer with Diverse Electron-Accepting Partners

Holmes, D.; Zhou, J.; Smith, J. A.; Wang, C.; Liu, X.; Lovley, D.

2022-04-28 microbiology
10.1101/2022.04.27.489562 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) may be most important in methanogenic environments, but studies to date that have examined the mechanisms for electron transfer from electron-donating partners have primarily focused on co-cultures in which fumarate was the terminal electron acceptor. To better understand DIET with methanogens, the transcriptome of Geobacter metallireducens during DIET-based growth with Geobacter sulfurreducens reducing fumarate was compared with the transcriptome of G. metallireducens grown in co-culture with diverse Methanosarcina species. The transcriptome of G. metallireducens co-cultured with G. sulfurreducens was significantly different from those with Methanosarcina. Furthermore, the transcriptome of G. metallireducens grown with Methanosarcina barkeri, which lacks outer-surface cytochromes, was different from the transcriptome of G. metallireducens co-cultured with Methanosarcina acetivorans or Methanosarcina subterranea, which have an outer-surface c-type cytochrome that serves as an electrical connect for DIET. Differences in G. metallireducens expression patterns for c-type cytochrome genes were particularly notable. The impact of deleting G. metallireducens c-type cytochrome genes depended upon the electron-accepting partner. Multiple cytochromes that G. metallireducens required for DIET with G. sulfurreducens and for Fe(III) oxide reduction were not required for DIET with the Methanosarcina species. Porin-cytochrome complexes and e-pili were required for optimal DIET with all partners. Shewanella oneidensis, another electroactive microbe with abundant outer-surface c-type cytochromes, did not grow via DIET. The results demonstrate that the presence of outer-surface cytochromes does not necessarily confer the capacity for DIET, and also emphasize the substantial impact of the physiology of the electron-accepting partner on the physiology of the electron-donating DIET partner.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.