Back

Assessing clinical outcomes of vancomycin treatment in adult patients with penicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia

Sasano, H.; Arakawa, R.; Hanada, K.

2022-04-28 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.04.27.22274384 medRxiv
Show abstract

Enterococcal bacteremia is associated with high mortality and long-term hospitalization. Here, we aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and evaluate risk factors for mortality in adult patients treated with vancomycin (VCM) for penicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) bacteremia. Data were collected from inpatients at a single university hospital between January 2009 and December 2020. The area under the curve (AUC) of VCM was calculated using the Bayesian approach. The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. Univariate analysis showed significant differences in the combined use of vasopressors, history of the use of inactive antimicrobial agents against E. faecium, VCM plasma trough concentration, and renal dysfunction during VCM administration between 30-day mortality and survival groups. However, the AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was not significantly different. Multivariate analysis revealed that concomitant vasopressors were an independent risk factor for 30-day all-cause mortality (odds risk, 7.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-52.9; P = 0.035). VCM plasma trough concentrations and AUC/MIC in the mortality group were higher than those in the surviving group. Depending on the drug-susceptibility results of E. faecium, it is considered that the AUC/MIC is calculated at a double AUC value. No association between AUC/MIC and treatment effect in E. faecium bacteremia was assumed because the known target AUC/MIC was sufficiently achieved in the mortality group. When an immunocompromised host develops E. faecium bacteremia with septic shock, especially in situations where the hemodynamics of using a pressor agent is unstable, treating it exclusively by sufficient exposure to antibacterial agents may be difficult.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
3
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
4
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
6
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
16
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%
22
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
25
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%