Back

Assessing clinical outcomes of vancomycin treatment in adult patients with penicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia

Sasano, H.; Arakawa, R.; Hanada, K.

2022-04-28 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.04.27.22274384 medRxiv
Show abstract

Enterococcal bacteremia is associated with high mortality and long-term hospitalization. Here, we aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and evaluate risk factors for mortality in adult patients treated with vancomycin (VCM) for penicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) bacteremia. Data were collected from inpatients at a single university hospital between January 2009 and December 2020. The area under the curve (AUC) of VCM was calculated using the Bayesian approach. The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. Univariate analysis showed significant differences in the combined use of vasopressors, history of the use of inactive antimicrobial agents against E. faecium, VCM plasma trough concentration, and renal dysfunction during VCM administration between 30-day mortality and survival groups. However, the AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was not significantly different. Multivariate analysis revealed that concomitant vasopressors were an independent risk factor for 30-day all-cause mortality (odds risk, 7.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-52.9; P = 0.035). VCM plasma trough concentrations and AUC/MIC in the mortality group were higher than those in the surviving group. Depending on the drug-susceptibility results of E. faecium, it is considered that the AUC/MIC is calculated at a double AUC value. No association between AUC/MIC and treatment effect in E. faecium bacteremia was assumed because the known target AUC/MIC was sufficiently achieved in the mortality group. When an immunocompromised host develops E. faecium bacteremia with septic shock, especially in situations where the hemodynamics of using a pressor agent is unstable, treating it exclusively by sufficient exposure to antibacterial agents may be difficult.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
15.0%
2
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.1%
4
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
5
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
8
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
9
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Antibiotics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
15
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Pathogens
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
Journal of Clinical Virology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
19
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
26
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%