Factors Influencing Health Impacts among Smartphone Users in New Normal Situation: A Case Study among University Students in Thailand
Wilaiwan, W.; Frost, E. G.; Siriwong, W.
Show abstract
BackgroundNowadays, smartphone users are increasing across the world. Smartphones have become a necessary thing in peoples life. Using smartphones have both benefits and health effects. Therefore, this study mainly aims to develop an appropriate mobile application to be the tool for health effects and finding factors associated with a health risk from smartphone usage. MethodsThis study was a cross-sectional descriptive study. The data was conducted in Thailand. The sample size was 500 university students. The Smartphone U Health mobile application was developed and shown in the Play Store and App Store. The self-administration was used for data collection throughout the Smart U Health. Data were entered and analyzed with licensed SPSS version 22. ResultsThe participants, including 328 females (65.6%) and 172 males (34.4%) with an average age was 20.3{+/-}1.5 years old. The average period of using smartphones was 7.9{+/-}2.0 years. The average time spent was 8.6{+/-}3.4 hours/day. The primary physical, mental, and social health effects from smartphone usage over three months were eye pain (93.8%), feeling bored (90.4%), the participants had a communication problem with other people (84.0%), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the significant factors associated with a health risk from smartphone usage were faculty, income, using smartphones in the classroom, experience of resting their eyes before continuing. Moreover, knowledge and practice levels were significantly associated with health risk levels from smartphone usage. ConclusionOveruse of smartphones had many health effects. The Smart U Health mobile application might be the appropriate tool to assess smartphone users health risk levels. In the future, it may consider an intervention study to reduce health risks from smartphone usage.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Web-based, Mobile Responsive Application to Screen Healthcare Workers for COVID Symptoms: Descriptive Study 94%
- Applications and barriers to use of an mHealth iPhone application for self-management of chronic recurrent medical conditions: A Pilot Study 93%
- Knowledge, attitude and practice toward COVID-19 among healthcare workers in public health facilities, Eastern Ethiopia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 95%
- Social networking service, patient-generated health data, and population health informatics: patterns and implications for using digital technologies to support mental health 94%
- Smartphone overuse and visual impairment in children and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can digital citizen science approaches improve ethical smartphone use surveillance among youth: traditional surveys versus ecological momentary assessments 96%
- Views and experiences of young people on using mHealth platforms for sexual and reproductive health services in rural low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review 94%
- Exploring Factors Affecting the Adoption and Continuance Usage of Drone in Healthcare: The Role of the Environment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding the Impact of Digital Technology on the Well-being of Older Immigrants and Refugees: A Scoping Review Protocol 92%
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 92%
- Mobile consulting (mConsulting) as an option for accessing healthcare services for communities in remote rural areas and urban slums in low- and middle- income countries: A mixed methods study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.