The Devil Is In The Details: Landscape Features Are Insufficient To Explain Patterns Of Non-Native Fishes Distribution In North Patagonian Streams
Lallement, M. E.; Rechencq, M.; Zattara, E. E.
Show abstract
Ecological communities are structured by combinations of factors known as habitat templates. These templates work as a filter allowing only species with particular traits or phenotypes to establish and persist excluding all others. Defining which habitat variables and spatial scales drive the assembly of freshwater communities is key to effective and efficient management of fluvial ecosystems. We took advantage of the relatively recent and well-studied history of salmonid introductions in Patagonia to evaluate if non-native species show different patterns of association with abiotic factors depending on the spatial scale of the environmental filter. We used a hierarchical approach to characterized environmental variables at the basin and reach scales to assess their influence on the presence, abundance and structure of the salmonid assemblages in breeding streams. We saw no evidence that presence/absence patterns of salmonid distribution were driven by landscape variables, except for those basins with physical environmental barriers to colonization. However, we did find evidence for relative abundances being influenced by climatic and geomorphological variables (e.g., precipitation and relief). Our results do not support a scenario in which any of the salmonid species modulates the distribution of the other species, suggesting that interference has played only a minor role in determining current fish distribution in fluvial systems of the region. Instead, current patterns of presence and abundance of salmonids are best explained as the product of environmental filters. Our findings contribute to our understanding of the ecology of individual species and provide insight into the mechanisms structuring fish assemblages in Southern Hemispheres lotic systems.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Response of benthic macroinvertebrates to dam removal in the restoration of the Boardman River, Michigan, USA 95%
- Agricultural impacts on streams near Nitrate Vulnerable Zones: a case study in the Ebro basin, northern Spain 95%
- Resilience of riparian vegetation composition and diversity following cessation of livestock grazing in northeastern Oregon, USA 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationship between salmon egg subsidy and the distribution of an avian predator 96%
- Population genetics of Bull Trout ( Salvelinus confluentus ) in the Upper Athabasca river basin 95%
- Integrating environmental DNA monitoring to inform eel (Anguilla anguilla) status in freshwaters at their easternmost range - A case study in Cyprus 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Run-of-River Damming on Increasing Phytoplankton Biomass and Species Shift in a Large Amazonian River 95%
- Space-time dynamics in monitoring neotropical fish communities using eDNA metabarcoding 95%
- Mapping differences in mammalian distributions and diversity using environmental DNA from rivers 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Phylogenetic diversity efficiently and accurately prioritizes the conservation of aquatic macroinvertebrate communities 95%
- Let's Do the Time Warp Again: Non-linear time series matching as a tool for sequentially structured data in ecology 94%
- Forecasting the effects of water regulation on the population viability of a threatened amphibian 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- On the efficacy of restoration in stream networks: comments, critiques, and prospective recommendations 95%
- The persistence in time of distributional patterns in marine megafauna impacts zonal conservation strategies 94%
- Effects of water nutrient concentrations on stream macroinvertebrate community stoichiometry: a large-scale study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.