Back

Similarities and differences in molecular epidemiology of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli carried by dogs living in urban and nearby rural settings and associated behavioural risk factors

Sealey, J. E.; Hammond, A.; Mounsey, O.; Gould, V. C.; Reyher, K. K.; Avison, M. B.

2022-04-25 microbiology
10.1101/2022.04.23.489260 bioRxiv
Show abstract

SynopsisO_ST_ABSObjectivesC_ST_ABSOur aims were to compare faecal third-generation cephalosporin-resistant (3GC-R) Escherichia coli isolates from dogs living in a city and in a rural area ~30 km away; to compare isolates from dogs, cattle, and humans in these regions; to determine risk factors associated with 3GC-R E. coli carriage in these two cohorts of dogs. Methods600 dogs were included, with faecal samples processed to recover 3GC-R E. coli using 2 mg/L cefotaxime. WGS was by Illumina; risk factor analyses were multivariable linear regression using the results of an owner-completed survey. Results3GC-R E. coli were excreted by 20/303 rural and 31/297 urban dogs. Dog/human sharing was evident for the dominant canine 3GC-R sequence type, ST963(blaCMY-2). Cattle/dog sharing was evident for CTX-M-14 and CTX-M-32-producing E. coli from rural dogs, including sharing of plasmid pMOO-32, which is common on cattle farms in the area. Feeding raw meat was associated with carrying 3GC-R E. coli in rural dogs, but not in urban dogs, where swimming in rivers was a weak risk factor. ConclusionsGiven clear zoonotic potential for resistant canine E. coli, our work suggests interventions that may reduce this threat. In rural dogs, carriage of 3GC-R E. coli, particularly CTX-M producers, was phylogenetically associated with interaction with local cattle and epidemiologically associated with feeding raw meat. In urban dogs, sources of 3GC-R E. coli appear to be more varied and include environments such as rivers.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.6%
3
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
5
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
8
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
11
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
12
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
14
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
15
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
16
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
20
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
24
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%